AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lily-devel"
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Doc help: \markup{} vs \mark
On 11-May-05, at 8:30 AM, Stephen wrote:
I got confused by associating this with the markup vs. TextScript thread.
thin
On 11-May-05, at 8:30 AM, Stephen wrote:
I got confused by associating this with the markup vs. TextScript
thread. thinking he was asking which one we still need, which is both
of course because they do different things. Obviously, Graham Percival
is just suggesting that we should document that
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "lily-devel"
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 4:36 AM
Subject: Re: Doc help: \markup{} vs \mark
Stephen wrote:
\mark has evolved into a way to put text over a barline, but you cannot
use \markup to put te
Graham Percival wrote:
What's the actual difference between \markup and \mark?
\markup is a text formatting command. See it as a "mini LaTeX". \mark
puts stuff on bar-lines.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilyp
g
as you use \mark for rehearsal marks.
- Simple text strings typeset using the default font versus text
markups, i.e. "string" versus \markup{\italic \large string }.
/Mats
Stephen
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lily-deve
\mark has evolved into a way to put text over a barline, but you cannot use
\markup to put text over a barline, only over a note.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lily-devel"
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:32 PM
What's the actual difference between \markup and \mark?
Historically, \mark was used for rehearsal marks, and the docs reflect
that. These days, however, \mark is used for things like fermatas on
bar lines, "DS. al Fine" right-aligned at the end of a piece, etc.
Is the "definition" of a \mark simp
