Re: Doc: Pitches.itely @knownissue OctavateEight grob (issue 6761045)

Thanks Janek, done and pushed with your syntax change. http://codereview.appspot.com/6761045/diff/6001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6761045/diff/6001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode1183 Documen

Re: Doc: Pitches.itely @knownissue OctavateEight grob (issue 6761045)

one nitpick, otherwise LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/6761045/diff/6001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6761045/diff/6001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode1183 Documentation/notation/pitches.ite

Re: Doc: Pitches.itely @knownissue OctavateEight grob (issue 6761045)

Reviewers: Trevor Daniels, Message: On 2012/10/24 14:57:28, Trevor Daniels wrote: LGTM, but just a thought - might it be better to override the colour so the change results in something visible rather than just an absence of the clef? Trevor Good idea. Next patch on its way. James Descripti

Doc: Pitches.itely @knownissue OctavateEight grob (issue 6761045)

LGTM, but just a thought - might it be better to override the colour so the change results in something visible rather than just an absence of the clef? Trevor http://codereview.appspot.com/6761045/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.o