I don't mind if we follow a different style. What would
you recommend?
Of course, changing the style would mean that all occurrences should be
fixed.
https://codereview.appspot.com/551270043/
> > I'm not a native speaker, but I think exactly the opposite,
> > given that 'i.e.' means 'that is' and 'e.g.' means 'for
> > example'.
I don't understand your point. [...]
It's a matter of style, not a matter of grammar correctness.
I've never understood the point of two spaces after a
LGTM, thanks!
https://codereview.appspot.com/551270043/diff/583260043/Documentation/notation/editorial.itely
File Documentation/notation/editorial.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/551270043/diff/583260043/Documentation/notation/editorial.itely#newcode576
Documentation/notation/edit
On 2019/12/20 00:45:05, dak wrote:
On 2019/12/20 00:01:59, lemzwerg wrote:
> > > There should always a comma after 'i.e.', as far as I know.
> >
> > Nope. It's grammatical dogma (in the same vein as not
> > starting sentences with the words 'And' or 'Because).
> > I think commas after these abbr
On 2019/12/20 00:01:59, lemzwerg wrote:
> > There should always a comma after 'i.e.', as far as I know.
>
> Nope. It's grammatical dogma (in the same vein as not
> starting sentences with the words 'And' or 'Because).
> I think commas after these abbreviations look ugly.
I'm not a native spea
> There should always a comma after 'i.e.', as far as I know.
Nope. It's grammatical dogma (in the same vein as not
starting sentences with the words 'And' or 'Because).
I think commas after these abbreviations look ugly.
I'm not a native speaker, but I think exactly the opposite, given that
https://codereview.appspot.com/551270043/diff/575420043/Documentation/notation/editorial.itely
File Documentation/notation/editorial.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/551270043/diff/575420043/Documentation/notation/editorial.itely#newcode496
Documentation/notation/editorial.itely:49
LGTM, with some minor remarks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/551270043/diff/575420043/Documentation/notation/editorial.itely
File Documentation/notation/editorial.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/551270043/diff/575420043/Documentation/notation/editorial.itely#newcode496
Documentat
