Re: Distribution updates and documentation woes

2009-01-16 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op vrijdag 16-01-2009 om 10:01 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef John Mandereau: Hi John, [snip all good stuff] > >share/doc/lilypond/Documentation/* > >share/info/dir > >share/info/* > > I'm for this too. Unless somebody wants to it right now, I'll have time to > do it next Wednesday

Re: Distribution updates and documentation woes

2009-01-16 Thread John Mandereau
Hi Jan, Jan Nieuwenhuizen a écrit : After 2.12 I decided to do my small round checking of distributions again Super; I think it's a good idea to go on mentioning distros that provide latest stable on the download page, so I've added links for Fedora and Slackware. (should we add something

Re: Distribution updates and documentation woes

2009-01-15 Thread Eyolf Østrem
On 15.01.2009 (16:43), Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Hi, > > After 2.12 I decided to do my small round checking of distributions > again (should we add something like this to release tasks?). > > Fedora already has 2.12 (yay!), while Debian and Ubuntu already had 2.12 > wishlist bugs filed (great

Re: Distribution updates and documentation woes

2009-01-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> And last but not least: what about our own documentation builds? > Info docs are missing here altogether! Should we include info docs > and re-root the documentation ball to look like > >share/doc/lilypond/Documentation/* >share/info/dir >share/info/* I'm all for it. Werner

Distribution updates and documentation woes

2009-01-15 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Hi, After 2.12 I decided to do my small round checking of distributions again (should we add something like this to release tasks?). Fedora already has 2.12 (yay!), while Debian and Ubuntu already had 2.12 wishlist bugs filed (great!), but none of the major distributions manages to provide pro