ornello wrote
> Cross-staff chords seem to work with stems up only.
For those who are interested, here is the solution (thanks to Eluze and
Thomas Morley):
\layout {
\context {
\PianoStaff
\consists #Span_stem_engraver
}
}
{
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff {
Cross-staff chords seem to work with stems up only. The following attempts to
create cross-staff chords with stem down did not work:
\layout {
\context {
\PianoStaff
\consists #Span_stem_engraver
}
}
{
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff {
\stemDown
< b d'&
Quoting Carl Sorensen :
Oops, no. I forgot to mention that you should also set padding to be
something like -minimum-distance, or in your example -9.
That works!
The staves will now be fixed, but you will need to makesure to leave
enough space for dynamics, etc.
Absolutely. I just don
Quoting Janek Warchoł :
Hi Pavel,
2012/1/7 Pavel Roskin :
I believe it would be nice to have support for cross-staff chords.
Perhaps it could be done as another snippet. I'm a beginner in Scheme
and Lilypond, so it takes me quite a lot of effort. I'll appreciate
some help.
Hi Pavel,
2012/1/7 Pavel Roskin :
> I believe it would be nice to have support for cross-staff chords.
> Perhaps it could be done as another snippet. I'm a beginner in Scheme
> and Lilypond, so it takes me quite a lot of effort. I'll appreciate
> some help.
>
>
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 7, 2012, at 12:06 AM, "Pavel Roskin"
mailto:pro...@gnu.org>> wrote:
Quoting Carl Sorensen mailto:c_soren...@byu.edu>>:
There is no "forced-distance" now. I can use "minimal-distance", but
there is no guarantee that Lilypond won't increase the distance between
stave
Quoting Carl Sorensen :
There is no "forced-distance" now. I can use "minimal-distance", but
there is no guarantee that Lilypond won't increase the distance between
staves. And Lilypond may do it because of something in another measure.
You can get a fixed distance by setting minimal-distanc
On 1/6/12 9:18 PM, "Pavel Roskin" wrote:
>
>The problem is that both approaches depend on the ability to fix the
>distance between staves, which existed in Lilypond 2.4 both doesn't
>seem to exist now. The original file used:
>
>\context {
> \PianoStaff
> \accepts Dynamics
> \override Ve
ith the new Lilypond.
In some places, there are cross-staff chords, i.e. chords with
noteheads placed on both piano staves.
Lilypond documentation suggests making the stems on the lower
staff longer so they meet the stems on the upper staff:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation
On 10/29/07, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Montag, 29. Oktober 2007 schrieb Trevor Bača:
> > Unfortunately, I know of no better way to create cross-staff chords
> > than the documentation you point to in the manual.
> >
> > I'm just fin
Erik Sandberg wrote:
My question is really: Are there any (possibly far-future) plans to make true
cross-staff chords possible?
Yes, but for lack of oodles of money/time, they are still far-future.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Citerar Trevor Baca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 8/26/05, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While exploring MusicXML, I found an example of cross-staff chords, see
> page 19
> > of:
> > http://www.recordare.com/xml/musicxml-tuto
On 8/26/05, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While exploring MusicXML, I found an example of cross-staff chords, see page
> 19
> of:
> http://www.recordare.com/xml/musicxml-tutorial.pdf
>
> Have I missed something, or is this impossible to do
Hi,
While exploring MusicXML, I found an example of cross-staff chords, see page 19
of:
http://www.recordare.com/xml/musicxml-tutorial.pdf
Have I missed something, or is this impossible to do in lily? Are there plans to
add it?
Erik
___
lilypond
14 matches
Mail list logo
