On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:02:35PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/1/18 Patrick McCarty :
> > The most important thing about git commands that we should be
> > *absolutely* consistent about is this:
> >
> > (1) git-format-patch origin
> >
> > ...versus...
> >
> > (2) git format-patch origin
> >
2009/1/18 Patrick McCarty :
> The most important thing about git commands that we should be
> *absolutely* consistent about is this:
>
> (1) git-format-patch origin
>
> ...versus...
>
> (2) git format-patch origin
>
> Out of the box, command (1) will only work for Git versions < 1.6.*,
> and comman
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 09:25:13PM +0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> It's just past 9pm local time on Sunday. I went to university,
> took some pictures, got sucked into work and being polite to my
> supervisor, had dinner and bought breakfast for the next few days,
> and had a shower. Let's face i
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:33:47AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/devel/contrib-guide/Website-source-code.html#Website-source-code
The first command here creates a dir "lilypod-web" instead of "lilypond-web"
Please fix -- you ha
2009/1/18 Graham Percival :
> I've had problems with just "git pull"...
>
>> This only applies if there are no local changes, though.
>
> ... ah, for precisely for this reason. :)
>
>> In case there are, then issuing
>> either command produces a merge commit so that the commit graph now
>> looks
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:33:47AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/devel/contrib-guide/Website-source-code.html#Website-source-code
>
> The first command here creates a dir "lilypod-web" instead of "lilypond-web"
Please fix -- you have git access, right?
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 03:39:16PM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham, you wrote Sunday, January 18, 2009 1:25 PM
>
>> MEDIUM PRIORITY:
>> CG 1 git
>> - Trevor, you are volunteered to perfect CG 1.5
>
> I did this last week, unless someone points out what is
> wrong with it.
Well, "perfect do
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 04:27:00PM +0100, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> 2009/1/18 Graham Percival :
> > By "work fine", I also want to know that:
> > - future pulls work with simply "git pull" or "git pull origin"
> > (whatever is listed in that section)
> > - creating patches works with whatever the
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 04:18:24PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> I suppose it should rather be
>git-format-patch origin
> for one patch for each local commit or
>git-format-patch HEAD^1
> for just the last local commit.
Let's go with
git-format-patch origin
We don't want new cont
Graham Percival wrote:
HIGH PRIORITY:
- can somebody maoing check the maoing git commands in CG 1
already? Either somebody with a big internet connection, or
somebody who knows git so intimiately that he can state with
absolute certainty that the commands work.
Running Ubuntu 8.04
Che
Graham, you wrote Sunday, January 18, 2009 1:25 PM
MEDIUM PRIORITY:
CG 1 git
- Trevor, you are volunteered to perfect CG 1.5
I did this last week, unless someone points out what is
wrong with it.
- Jonathan, you are volunteered to perfect the rest of CG 1. If
you want to check the @exampl
2009/1/18 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Sonntag, 18. Januar 2009 15:47:34 schrieb Maximilian Albert:
>> 1.3.1: AFAICT the second command "git-format-patch HEAD" doesn't do
>> anything because HEAD is the latest commit the user did, i.e., it
>> already
2009/1/18 Graham Percival :
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 03:47:34PM +0100, Maximilian Albert wrote:
>> 2009/1/18 Graham Percival :
>>
>> > - can somebody maoing check the maoing git commands in CG 1
>> > already? Either somebody with a big internet connection, or
>>
>> Done. All of them work fine (b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 18. Januar 2009 15:47:34 schrieb Maximilian Albert:
> 1.3.1: AFAICT the second command "git-format-patch HEAD" doesn't do
> anything because HEAD is the latest commit the user did, i.e., it
> already includes his changes. Thus there is no d
On 1/18/09 6:25 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> CG 7 programming
> - Carl, this is your domain. Add whatever the Frogs need to know.
> CG 7.4 will require input from Werner, but only once we've
> caught up on other stuff.
>
OK, I'll continue with my work on CG 7.
Carl
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 03:47:34PM +0100, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> 2009/1/18 Graham Percival :
>
> > - can somebody maoing check the maoing git commands in CG 1
> > already? Either somebody with a big internet connection, or
>
> Done. All of them work fine (but se the comment on 1.3.1 below).
2009/1/18 Graham Percival :
> HIGH PRIORITY:
> - can somebody maoing check the maoing git commands in CG 1
> already? Either somebody with a big internet connection, or
> somebody who knows git so intimiately that he can state with
> absolute certainty that the commands work.
Done. All of the
It's just past 9pm local time on Sunday. I went to university,
took some pictures, got sucked into work and being polite to my
supervisor, had dinner and bought breakfast for the next few days,
and had a shower. Let's face it: I'm never going to finish the CG
at this rate.
So we need some "volun
18 matches
Mail list logo
