On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:09:45PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Friday, August 12, 2011 10:44 PM
>
> >Because some new doc editor -- quite possibly with relatively poor
> >English skills -- will write something new and @ref{} the section
> >name they see in the HMTL docs
Graham Percival wrote Friday, August 12, 2011 10:44 PM
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:22:49PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, August 12, 2011 5:09 PM
I don't see what difficulties arise from having
section names that differ slightly from the node
name, other than mayb
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:22:49PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Friday, August 12, 2011 5:09 PM
>
> >On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 01:41:29PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >>What I can imagine is that node names get automatically derived
> >>from
> >>section names. For examp
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:01:14PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > (do you have any clue when this will be? AFAIK the latest version
> > is 4.13a from 2008)
>
> Don't expect a release soon. It's still not really compatible to the
> good old makeinfo binary (and additionally at least 20 times
Graham Percival wrote Friday, August 12, 2011 5:09 PM
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 01:41:29PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
What I can imagine is that node names get automatically derived
from
section names. For example, a script might check that, stripping
off
all texinfo commands and other fo
>> I second that. IMHO it's a very bad idea that we have to limit
>> correct use of English due to restrictions in a program (which are in
>> this case even non-existent)!
>
> I thought this was going to be a new feature of the next version
> of texinfo.
Commas in section names? No, this was a
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 01:41:29PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >> Yes. I disallow commas in @section headings because IMO we should
> >> always have the @section heading match the @node -- doing otherwise
> >> is just begging for trouble down the road.
>
>> Yes. I disallow commas in @section headings because IMO we should
>> always have the @section heading match the @node -- doing otherwise
>> is just begging for trouble down the road.
>
> OK. I'll fix the two that slipped through, although they look a
> littl
commas in @section headings because IMO we should
always have the @section heading match the @node -- doing
otherwise is just begging for trouble down the road.
OK. I'll fix the two that slipped through,
although they look a little strange without the
commas.
Ah, yes, I remember now.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:45:39AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Jean-Charles, you wrote Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:00 AM
>
> >You may not have a comma in a @node, but you can use it in its
> >labeling *section:
Yes. I disallow commas in @section headings because IMO
Jean-Charles, you wrote Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:00 AM
Le 11/08/2011 10:10, Trevor Daniels disait :
I vaguely remember commas should not be used in section headings,
but
can't remember why. There is nothing about this in the CG that I
can
find. Can you please remind me.
You may not
Le 11/08/2011 10:10, Trevor Daniels disait :
Graham
I vaguely remember commas should not be used in section headings, but
can't remember why. There is nothing about this in the CG that I can
find. Can you please remind me.
Trevor
You may not have a comma in a @node, but you can use it in its
Graham
I vaguely remember commas should not be used in section headings,
but can't remember why. There is nothing about this in the CG that
I can find. Can you please remind me.
Trevor
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database:
13 matches
Mail list logo
