Re: Clearify use of break-align-orders in NR A.17 Layout properties (issue 96650050)

2014-06-08 Thread tdanielsmusic
On 2014/06/08 01:11:12, Carl wrote: On 2014/06/05 09:42:54, Trevor Daniels wrote: > On 2014/06/05 09:36:24, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > > I suggest adding a new subsubsubsection to > > NR 1.6.2 Modifying single staves > > which could be entitled "Modifying prefatory matter". > > Correction: I shoul

Re: Clearify use of break-align-orders in NR A.17 Layout properties (issue 96650050)

2014-06-07 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
On 2014/06/05 09:42:54, Trevor Daniels wrote: On 2014/06/05 09:36:24, Trevor Daniels wrote: > I suggest adding a new subsubsubsection to > NR 1.6.2 Modifying single staves > which could be entitled "Modifying prefatory matter". Correction: I should have said "subsubsubheading". Trevor

Re: Clearify use of break-align-orders in NR A.17 Layout properties (issue 96650050)

2014-06-05 Thread tdanielsmusic
On 2014/06/03 22:14:39, thomasmorley651 wrote: I'm not sure I understand what we expect from an average user here. Apart from A.17 Layout properties there is only one occurence of BreakAlignment in the NR, but without explaing why it is nessacary at all. I doubt the user has the chance to figur

Re: Clearify use of break-align-orders in NR A.17 Layout properties (issue 96650050)

2014-06-05 Thread tdanielsmusic
On 2014/06/05 09:36:24, Trevor Daniels wrote: I suggest adding a new subsubsubsection to NR 1.6.2 Modifying single staves which could be entitled "Modifying prefatory matter". Correction: I should have said "subsubsubheading". Trevor https://codereview.appspot.com/96650050/ ___

Re: Clearify use of break-align-orders in NR A.17 Layout properties (issue 96650050)

2014-06-03 Thread thomasmorley65
On 2014/06/02 23:23:23, Carl wrote: On 2014/06/02 21:47:59, thomasmorley651 wrote: > Better referencing I think that this is a wrong approach. The list of properties in the .scm file is not the appropriate place to teach the use of the properties. Furthermore, in my opinion there should b

Re: Clearify use of break-align-orders in NR A.17 Layout properties (issue 96650050)

2014-06-02 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
On 2014/06/02 21:47:59, thomasmorley651 wrote: Better referencing Another (probably clearer and easier) alternative would be to bring the snippet that demonstrates the desired property usage into the Notation reference as a Selected Snippet at an appropriate location, probably in section 1.1.3

Re: Clearify use of break-align-orders in NR A.17 Layout properties (issue 96650050)

2014-06-02 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
On 2014/06/02 21:47:59, thomasmorley651 wrote: Better referencing I think that this is a wrong approach. The list of properties in the .scm file is not the appropriate place to teach the use of the properties. Furthermore, in my opinion there should be no links from the code to the documentat

Clearify use of break-align-orders in NR A.17 Layout properties (issue 96650050)

2014-06-01 Thread thomasmorley65
Reviewers: , Message: Please review Description: Clearify use of break-align-orders in NR A.17 Layout properties Issue 3939 It should be sufficient to refer to 'Separating key cancellations from key signature changes' from Documentation/snippets to show how to get different settings for end-of