Here you are.
2011/3/8
> Hearing no objections to the contrary, let's move forward. Janek, could
> you send me a patch for pushing?
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4236043/
>
From 36fc7746295b387e297ce0e4999a166eac836307 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Janek=20Warcho=C5=82?=
Date:
Hearing no objections to the contrary, let's move forward. Janek, could
you send me a patch for pushing?
http://codereview.appspot.com/4236043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM, passes regtests.
I'm not familiar with how we indent our mf files, so I can't vouch for
that.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4236043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Indents fixed.
Sorry it took so long - i had limited access to my lilydev-enabled
machine.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4236043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
please fix all indents
http://codereview.appspot.com/4236043/diff/1/mf/feta-flags.mf
File mf/feta-flags.mf (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4236043/diff/1/mf/feta-flags.mf#newcode138
mf/feta-flags.mf:138: save flagspace, total_depth, flag_count;
can you fix indent?
http://coderevie
2011/2/25 :
> I have created new [PATCH] issue for this:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1541
Thanks!
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I have created new [PATCH] issue for this:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1541
http://codereview.appspot.com/4236043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
This is a preparation for changes in the flag code that will be made
later (shortened flags affair).
This patch makes flags code more uniform and easier to maintain.
There is no actual change to the font itself, only to the way it is
coded.
(You may check this by running
mf '\mode:=proof; input
