Han-Wen Nienhuys skrev:
I think that you it will be trivially easy to use a set<> iso. writing
into the Context_def.
In dev/rune
-Rune
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Han-Wen Nienhuys skrev:
I don't think that will work. We can change all these definitions on
the fly using
\with {
\accepts ..
}
Even if this might not be working right now, but it should be in the future.
That is true. It won't work then.
But otoh, afaics the whole path_to_accepta
2007/11/17, Rune Zedeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (assuming you took this off the list on purpose)
No, on accident actually.
> > No, it's better that we don't do this. If you need marking of some
> > sort, pass a set into the function. It would be even
> > nicer to do without, but I'm not sure if i
I have made a check for cycles at any length - pushed it to dev/rune.
See files context-def.cc and context-def.hh
Main problem is that Context_def::path_to_acceptable_context cannot
anymore be marked as const because it needs to flag the contexts that it
visits.
Is this ok?
I still haven't ma
