dak wrote
> I think it quite unusual to have a figure without a note.
Quite to the contrary: Both for voice-leading indications (e.g. quick
resolution of suspensions) and point d'orgue situations, it's very common to
have multiple figures to the same note. For example, see the last two bars
of the
On Sun, 2017-07-16 at 10:09 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> which shows them centering the figure under a whole note
well, actually, *over* a whole note inthis case. The fact that the whole
note is so far away from the figure (because of its pitch) makes the
effect still more subtle, it becomes more
On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 16:15 -0700, thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2017/07/15 09:13:08, thomasmorley651 wrote:
>
> > If you try
> > \override BassFigure.X-offset =
> > #ly:self-alignment-interface::centered-on-x-parent
> > you'll see improvements in some cases (others are worse).
> > Therefor
On 2017/07/15 09:13:08, thomasmorley651 wrote:
If you try
\override BassFigure.X-offset =
#ly:self-alignment-interface::centered-on-x-parent
you'll see improvements in some cases (others are worse).
Therefore I think ly:self-alignment-interface::centered-on-x-parent is
not the
correct tool, bu
On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 02:09 -0700, thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2017/07/15 08:55:43, richard_rshann.plus.com wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 08:51 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 00:40 -0700, mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > > > On 2017/07/15 07:25:37, h
On 2017/07/15 09:03:30, richard_rshann.plus.com wrote:
On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 01:50 -0700, mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On 2017/07/15 08:06:41, http://richard_rshann.plus.com wrote:
>
> > So I think you could validly object that you didn't like them
being
> > treated differently.
>
On 2017/07/15 08:55:43, richard_rshann.plus.com wrote:
On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 08:51 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 00:40 -0700, mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com
wrote:
> > On 2017/07/15 07:25:37, http://richard_rshann.plus.com wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 00:09 -0700,
On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 01:50 -0700, thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2017/07/15 08:06:41, richard_rshann.plus.com wrote:
>
> > So I think you could validly object that you didn't like them being
> > treated differently.
>
> If you look at the following, namely the colored BassFigures
>
> cbf
On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 08:51 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 00:40 -0700, thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On 2017/07/15 07:25:37, richard_rshann.plus.com wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 00:09 -0700, mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > > > I'm afraid this patch d
On 2017/07/15 08:06:41, richard_rshann.plus.com wrote:
So I think you could validly object that you didn't like them being
treated differently.
If you look at the following, namely the colored BassFigures
cbf = \once \override BassFigure.color = #red
<<
\relative c' { c1 c8 d e f g f e d c1
On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 00:40 -0700, thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2017/07/15 07:25:37, richard_rshann.plus.com wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 00:09 -0700, mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > > I'm afraid this patch does not fix the problem as wished.
>
> > You give an example of m
On 2017/07/15 07:51:11, thomasmorley651 wrote:
On 2017/07/15 07:40:01, thomasmorley651 wrote:
>
> In
> <<
> \relative c' { c1 c1 }
> \figures { <6+>2 <6+>2 <6+>1 }
> >>
> I would expect same aligning for first and second BassFigure related
to the
> note.
Aargh, should read:
I would expec
On 2017/07/15 07:40:01, thomasmorley651 wrote:
On 2017/07/15 07:25:37, http://richard_rshann.plus.com wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 00:09 -0700, mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com
wrote:
> > I'm afraid this patch does not fix the problem as wished.
> You give an example of multiple bass figure
On 2017/07/15 07:25:37, richard_rshann.plus.com wrote:
On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 00:09 -0700, mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I'm afraid this patch does not fix the problem as wished.
You give an example of multiple bass figures on a note, I'm not sure
what you would wish to see for tha
On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 00:09 -0700, thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm afraid this patch does not fix the problem as wished.
It solves the problem of single bass figures and isolated accidentals on
notes of duration longer than whole note as the comment says.
You give an example of multiple ba
I'm afraid this patch does not fix the problem as wished.
See my comment on the tracker:
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5154/#1933
https://codereview.appspot.com/325070043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https:/
16 matches
Mail list logo
