Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> To make this more explicit: I don't think we should do this. Mirroring
> to Savannah and pulling from there is just fine and, as others have
> expressed, probably the wiser decision long-term.
With regard to "long-term": updating the pull location of the website
server a
To make this more explicit: I don't think we should do this. Mirroring
to Savannah and pulling from there is just fine and, as others have
expressed, probably the wiser decision long-term.
Am Samstag, den 16.05.2020, 12:22 +0200 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> I did this. For reference, you can find o
I did this. For reference, you can find out what is running as follows:
$ crontab -l
# from website-rebuild.cron
LILYPOND_GIT=/home/graham/lilypond/lilypond-git/
LILYPOND_WEB_MEDIA_GIT=/home/graham/lilypond/lilypond-extra/
PATH=/home/graham/usr/bin/:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin
1
Am Samstag, den 16.05.2020, 11:02 +0100 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> Currently I expect that the website is still being built from Savannah. It
> is updated by 2 cron jobs that run every hour, 30 minutes apart.
> update-git.sh updates its repository and make-website.sh makes the website.
> These scri
Currently I expect that the website is still being built from Savannah. It
is updated by 2 cron jobs that run every hour, 30 minutes apart.
update-git.sh updates its repository and make-website.sh makes the website.
These scripts are shown on
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/contrib
