Yeah, my changes are just some of the stuff you did for fink, but made
conditional so that they're portable.
On Apr 24, 2004, at 3:17 AM, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
Obviously, I think that Mac users should prefer to install the fink
package, as that simplifies the dependency management considera
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
I think that the proper place is the packager for MacOS X, which is
Matthias Neeracher, I hope he can fold in your changes into his Fink
package.
I'm not sure. Would it not be a good thing (tm) if lily compiled out
of the box,
This is a fix for the vanilla sources. I wanted to start learning and
possibly contribute, but the CVS checkout didn't build for me.
In fact, what I've done is just taken a couple lines from the fink
patched makefiles and put them in a conditional so they don't break
everyone else.
David
On
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> I think that the proper place is the packager for MacOS X, which is
> Matthias Neeracher, I hope he can fold in your changes into his Fink
> package.
I'm not sure. Would it not be a good thing (tm) if lily compiled out
of the box, package or not?
Is this fix for the f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi. I have a patch to make lilypond 2.3 build on OS X/Darwin. I sent
> this to the wrong place first, sorry about that. Patch is below.
I think that the proper place is the packager for MacOS X, which is
Matthias Neeracher, I hope he can fold in your changes into
Hi. I have a patch to make lilypond 2.3 build on OS X/Darwin. I sent
this to the wrong place first, sorry about that. Patch is below.
Also, when I do a 'cvs update' I get lily/input-file-results.cc as a
zero length file. The log says that the file has been removed. Is
this just me?
Thank
