Re: Bug scope

2004-04-23 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Mats Bengtsson writes: > Do you and Jan intend to review the CVS submissions? No, don't worry ;-) We'll correct mistakes, if we see them, but you're most invited to do that too. `Interesting' changelog entries may trigger to take a look at a change. > There's a risk that when I or someone else

Re: Bug scope

2004-04-22 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I just realised that bugs may exist in the documentation as well.. Am I supposed to keep track of those too? No, since those can be fixed without debugging. We just need someone to correct the mistakes in CVS. Do you and Jan intend to rev

Bug scope

2004-04-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi, > > I just realised that bugs may exist in the documentation as well.. Am I > supposed to keep track of those too? No, since those can be fixed without debugging. We just need someone to correct the mistakes in CVS. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug scope

2004-04-21 Thread Erik Sandberg
Hi, I just realised that bugs may exist in the documentation as well.. Am I supposed to keep track of those too? Erik ___ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel