Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Removing the ChangeLog might be a good idea anyway, since it is not
of much use for users. However, I oppose to scrambling email
addresses everywhere. It doesn't solve the problem of spam and
worm-mail (your address is broad
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Removing the ChangeLog might be a good idea anyway, since it is not of
much use for users. However, I oppose to scrambling email addresses
everywhere. It doesn't solve the problem of spam and worm-mail (your
address is broadcast via the mailinglist
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Removing the ChangeLog might be a good idea anyway, since it is not of
much use for users. However, I oppose to scrambling email addresses
everywhere. It doesn't solve the problem of spam and worm-mail (your
address is broadcast via the mailinglist to virus-infested plat
Juergen Reuter wrote:
... I would like to ask if the e-Mail addresses in the ChangeLog could
be either encrypted or replaced by e.g. http addresses.
From carefully analyzing some of the countless spam mails and delivery
failure notification mails, it looks like as if the ChangeLog file is
one o
On 17-May-05, at 3:27 AM, Juergen Reuter wrote:
... I would like to ask if the e-Mail addresses in the ChangeLog could
be either encrypted or replaced by e.g. http addresses.
This would be nice; could we also protect the Authors page?
Cheers,
- Graham
_
... I would like to ask if the e-Mail addresses in the ChangeLog could be
either encrypted or replaced by e.g. http addresses.
From carefully analyzing some of the countless spam mails and delivery
failure notification mails, it looks like as if the ChangeLog file is one
of the major sources fo
