Re: Be more explicit about footnotes on chord constituents (issue 7038047)

2013-03-05 Thread dak
Reviewers: J_lowe, Trevor Daniels, Message: I hate it when I discover I had unpublished draft comments on an issue that has been closed long ago. I am flushing out these comments nevertheless for the record so that reviewers don't think I ignored their feedback (rather than being of different op

Re: Be more explicit about footnotes on chord constituents (issue 7038047)

2013-01-02 Thread tdanielsmusic
LGTM I tried to make the text as concise as possible, so it's quite expected that some expansion would be required once someone tried to grasp this from scratch. https://codereview.appspot.com/7038047/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): h

Be more explicit about footnotes on chord constituents (issue 7038047)

2013-01-02 Thread pkx166h
coming from a 'not developer's' point of view. https://codereview.appspot.com/7038047/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/7038047/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1338 Documentation/notation/