I am fine with dropping this code.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In responding to Trevor Daniels's review of NR 2.7 Chords, I came across the
> fact that the Banter chord naming code is broken -- it will not produce
> output for a simple c chord.
>
In responding to Trevor Daniels's review of NR 2.7 Chords, I came across the
fact that the Banter chord naming code is broken -- it will not produce
output for a simple c chord.
First question: Does anybody know when Banter chord naming quit working?
In searching the internet to see more about Ba