On 2008/10/11 01:19 +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2008/10/11 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Those objects are often objects kicked out of the branch history after a
> > rebase.
>
> Could you explain why you don't obtain these warnings? Just curiosity.
Because I still have commits that
2008/10/11 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Those objects are often objects kicked out of the branch history after a
> rebase.
Could you explain why you don't obtain these warnings? Just curiosity.
> If you just copy'n'paste "make translation-status"
> output, I can hopefully fix it in 5 mi
Hi Francisco,
On 2008/10/08 20:20 +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> When running make translation-status I obtain 'bad object' warnings on
> these files:
>
> fr/user/macros.itexi
> de/user/macros.itexi
> fr/user/lilypond.tely
>
> This makes the status page not properly updateable by me. As I usually
Francisco Vila schrieb:
Hello, John and translators,
When running make translation-status I obtain 'bad object' warnings on
these files:
fr/user/macros.itexi
de/user/macros.itexi
fr/user/lilypond.tely
ok, so this is the thing that cases the bad objects? I will update my
macros since they
Hello, John and translators,
When running make translation-status I obtain 'bad object' warnings on
these files:
fr/user/macros.itexi
de/user/macros.itexi
fr/user/lilypond.tely
This makes the status page not properly updateable by me. As I usually
work only on the lilypond/translation branch, I
