Re: Automated engraving benchmarks

2014-03-01 Thread Urs Liska
Am 01.03.2014 11:41, schrieb James: On 01/03/14 10:35, Urs Liska wrote: What do you think, where should such a set go? Of course it would be easier to maintain it in a separate Git repository, hosted anywhere. But I think it should be part of lilypond.org, which would additionally add it to m

Re: Automated engraving benchmarks

2014-03-01 Thread James
On 01/03/14 10:35, Urs Liska wrote: What do you think, where should such a set go? Of course it would be easier to maintain it in a separate Git repository, hosted anywhere. But I think it should be part of lilypond.org, which would additionally add it to make doc. We already have a locat

Re: Automated engraving benchmarks

2014-03-01 Thread Urs Liska
Am 28.02.2014 22:29, schrieb Trevor Daniels: Urs Liska wrote Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:44 AM Hi, I just had an idea. I suggest creating a set of "benchmark scores" and putting them somewhere on the website. But of course we should then have "default" scores like a classical piano piece,

Re: Automated engraving benchmarks

2014-02-28 Thread Trevor Daniels
Urs Liska wrote Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:44 AM > Hi, I just had an idea. > > I suggest creating a set of "benchmark scores" and putting them > somewhere on the website. > > But of course we should then have "default" scores like a classical > piano piece, a string quartet and a moderately