Re: Auto-beam in 2.6

2005-07-18 Thread Mats Bengtsson
my outbox for nearly two weeks. Stephen - Original Message - From: "Joe Neeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lilypond Devel" Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 9:15 AM Subject: Re: Auto-beam in 2.6 Stephen wrote: I believe revert- works like every other revert and only

Re: Auto-beam in 2.6

2005-07-17 Thread Graham Percival
On 17-Jul-05, at 3:28 PM, Stephen wrote: I want to point out that I do not think you need the revert to cancel them, since they will be canceled just by changing the time signature. You could also stick them in a def.ly file and include them at the top of your file, since they would not be in

Re: Auto-beam in 2.6

2005-07-17 Thread Stephen
;Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lilypond Devel" Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 2:00 PM Subject: Re: Auto-beam in 2.6 On 17-Jul-05, at 11:30 AM, Stephen wrot

Re: Auto-beam in 2.6

2005-07-17 Thread Graham Percival
On 17-Jul-05, at 11:30 AM, Stephen wrote: The main thing is that I would like to create my own custom overrides for signatures like 5/4, but I don't understand it well enough. The convenience of not having to manually beam every last note in a piece is worth the effort. For 5/8, I use one o

Re: Auto-beam in 2.6

2005-07-17 Thread Stephen
he parser, not how it affects the output. Has anyone used it? NOTE: this has been stuck in my outbox for nearly two weeks. Stephen - Original Message - From: "Joe Neeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lilypond Devel" Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 9:15 AM Subject: Re:

Re: Auto-beam in 2.6

2005-07-17 Thread Stephen
ginal Message - From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Joe Neeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lilypond Devel" Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 4:29 AM Subject: Re: Auto-beam in 2.6 The default values

Re: Auto-beam in 2.6

2005-07-06 Thread Graham Percival
On 4-Jul-05, at 7:15 AM, Joe Neeman wrote: Anyway, I wrote this thing up yesterday. I think it explains changing the auto-beam behaviour better than the current page does. You'll notice that I skip over any description of beam beginnings. That's because I don't understand it yet :P Thanks,

Re: Auto-beam in 2.6

2005-07-04 Thread Joe Neeman
Stephen wrote: > I believe revert- works like every other revert and only reverts a > previous override, restoring the default, not reverting the default > itself. After all, revert means to go back to a previous state, not to > establish a state. I think the confusing thing here (for me at least

Re: Auto-beam in 2.6

2005-07-04 Thread Mats Bengtsson
f) > > Stephen > > - Original Message - > From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Joe Neeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Lilypond Devel" ; > Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 4:29 PM > Subject: Re: Auto-beam

Re: Auto-beam in 2.6

2005-07-03 Thread Stephen
#'(revert-auto-beam-setting '(1 16 4 8) 'Staff) Stephen - Original Message - From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Joe Neeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Lilypond Devel" ; Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 4:29 PM Subject: Re

Re: Auto-beam in 2.6

2005-07-02 Thread Mats Bengtsson
revert-... will only remove start/stop points that have already been defined earlier and as far as I can understand, you have to use exactly the same parameters (for example wildcards or absence of wildcards) as in the already existing settings. In other words, you have to go into the file /usr/sh