On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 16:24, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> I would not base anything on the chord name itself (ie. the output
> string). Systems for chord names are highly non-standard, so they're
> not a good basis to interpret. I suppose that you would have to
> devise some kind of lookup structure
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 10:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As I said before, I really do love the quality of Lilypond output. So I hope
> you'll take this in the spirit it's intended: observations from a domain
> expert
> that may or may not be useful to you in the future.
>
Thanks for the input. I'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've been studying and thinking about architectures for Fret Diagrams in
> lilypond.
>
> It seems to me that there should be a FretDiagrams context which would
> process exactly the same music expression as the ChordNames context.
> Then, a lead sheet with fret diagram
I've been studying and thinking about architectures for Fret Diagrams in
lilypond.
It seems to me that there should be a FretDiagrams context which would
process exactly the same music expression as the ChordNames context.
Then, a lead sheet with fret diagrams could look like:
\score {
<<
