Sorry - this patch is obsolete. The new one is at:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4527086
Sorry for not having removed the old one, and yes, please add the new one to
the countdown (it has gone through a round of commentary).
Cheers,
MS
On Jun 24, 2011, at 4:28 PM, percival.music...@gmail.com
On 2011/05/30 07:38:19, mike_apollinemike.com wrote:
I'm flying to Ireland today & will attempt to crunch this during the
flight.
This was almost a month ago. Are you sailing to Ireland instead of
flying? ;)
What's the status of this patch? If you think that draft 2 is correct,
then I'll ad
On May 30, 2011, at 12:20 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
> This fails the "sniff test" because it removes some careful-looking code
> no explanation as to how the job of the old code is being done.
>
> What happens if the line on the next page is does not, in fact, have the
> same vertical refere
This fails the "sniff test" because it removes some careful-looking code
no explanation as to how the job of the old code is being done.
What happens if the line on the next page is does not, in fact, have the
same vertical reference point?
\relative c''' { \override Staff . Glissando #'breakabl
On 2011/05/28 19:40:26, Graham Percival wrote:
Could we get that example as a regtest?
The regtest comparison shows some warnings in rest-polyphonic2.ly in a
different
place. I don't know if that's significant. Nothing else changed.
I ran the regtests and they look squeaky clean. Lemme
gmail.com> writes:
>
> The regtest comparison shows some warnings in rest-polyphonic2.ly in a
> different place. I don't know if that's significant.
It is not.
This is the regtest that proves "too-many colliding" rests will be placed
consistently, even though the array holding the "too-many"
Could we get that example as a regtest?
The regtest comparison shows some warnings in rest-polyphonic2.ly in a
different place. I don't know if that's significant. Nothing else
changed.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4564042/
___
lilypond-devel maili
Have you run a regtest comparison? I was doing a routine on this (and
your other patch at the same time), and paper-margins-consistency.ly
just borked.
I'm now also missing my GNUmakefile.in, which is *extremely* suspicious
because there's no way that running "make check" should delete that
file
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:22:01AM +, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
> Description:
> Allows line spanners to span multiple lines.
>
> Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/4564042/
Thanks, added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1673
Cheers,
- Graham
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Hey all,
A colleague of mine is working on a piece where he needs glissandi to
span multiple lines. I made this change and it seems to work. Lemme
know if you think it may break something else. I'll run regtests today
or tomorrow.
To test this patch, do:
\relative c''
10 matches
Mail list logo
