On Apr 5, 2011, at 4:00 PM, percival.music...@gmail.com wrote:
> LGTM, passes regtests.
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4339053/diff/1/input/regression/beam-collision-off.ly
> File input/regression/beam-collision-off.ly (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4339053/diff/1/input/regress
LGTM, passes regtests.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4339053/diff/1/input/regression/beam-collision-off.ly
File input/regression/beam-collision-off.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4339053/diff/1/input/regression/beam-collision-off.ly#newcode8
input/regression/beam-collision-off.ly:8:
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/4339053/diff/1/lily/beam-collision-engraver.cc
File lily/beam-collision-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4339053/diff/1/lily/beam-collision-engraver.cc#newcode60
lily/beam-collision-engraver.cc:60: break;
you can do
for ..
if (covered->has
Reviewers: ,
Message:
After some discussion on devel, it seems like a suitable thing to do in
the beam collision engraver would be to provide an opt-out for beam
collision. Irrespective of how the stem thing winds up getting
resolved, I think it's a good idea to be able to switch avoidance on an
