On 2013/04/17 18:27:05, MikeSol wrote:
Hey, I hadn't seen this. I just finished writing an equivalent patch.
Yours is
better, so keep it. You can use this for the
inherit-X-parent-visibility and
eliminate the inherit-Y-parent-visibility callback, which is cruft and
can be
replaced with the
On 17 avr. 2013, at 21:45, d...@gnu.org wrote:
> Reviewers: MikeSol,
>
> Message:
> On 2013/04/17 18:27:05, MikeSol wrote:
>> Hey, I hadn't seen this. I just finished writing an equivalent patch.
> Yours is
>> better, so keep it. You can use this for the
> inherit-X-parent-visibility and
>> eli
Reviewers: MikeSol,
Message:
On 2013/04/17 18:27:05, MikeSol wrote:
Hey, I hadn't seen this. I just finished writing an equivalent patch.
Yours is
better, so keep it. You can use this for the
inherit-X-parent-visibility and
eliminate the inherit-Y-parent-visibility callback, which is cruft
Hey, I hadn't seen this. I just finished writing an equivalent patch.
Yours is better, so keep it. You can use this for the
inherit-X-parent-visibility and eliminate the
inherit-Y-parent-visibility callback, which is cruft and can be replaced
with the X one.
https://codereview.appspot.com/872604