Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053)

2012-03-28 Thread graham
LGTM; since it's just a snippet now, I support pushing it directly as long as it compiles. http://codereview.appspot.com/5882053/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053)

2012-03-25 Thread graham
The basic question is this: is this test helpful for programmers? At first glance I'd say that it is, provided that you update the syntax as David suggested. IMO it takes a pretty silly example for something to *not* be a helpful test case. Sure, having complicated scheme here might mean that f

Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053)

2012-03-24 Thread James
Hello, On 24 March 2012 08:19, wrote: > On 2012/03/23 21:46:41, Pavel Roskin wrote: >> >> OK, I'll use make-engraver in the next revision.  I guess I'll need to > > strip all >> >> Lilypond 2.14 compatibility stuff if this snippet is to be a part of > > the >> >> Lilypond documentation. > > > In

Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053)

2012-03-24 Thread dak
On 2012/03/23 21:46:41, Pavel Roskin wrote: OK, I'll use make-engraver in the next revision. I guess I'll need to strip all Lilypond 2.14 compatibility stuff if this snippet is to be a part of the Lilypond documentation. In LilyPond itself, it makes sense to document the latest version. I

Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053)

2012-03-23 Thread plroskin
OK, I'll use make-engraver in the next revision. I guess I'll need to strip all Lilypond 2.14 compatibility stuff if this snippet is to be a part of the Lilypond documentation. I missed scheme engravers because I was looking for "\consists #" on one line, my bad. http://codereview.appspot.com/5

Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053)

2012-03-23 Thread dak
On 2012/03/23 13:04:19, Pavel Roskin wrote: This is also the first use of a scheme engraver in input/regression. Apart from scheme-engraver.ly, scheme-engraver-instance.ly, and scheme-text-spanner.ly. http://codereview.appspot.com/5882053/ ___ lilyp

Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053)

2012-03-23 Thread dak
http://codereview.appspot.com/5882053/diff/2001/input/regression/stem-cross-staff-engraver.ly File input/regression/stem-cross-staff-engraver.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5882053/diff/2001/input/regression/stem-cross-staff-engraver.ly#newcode100 input/regression/stem-cross-staff-eng

Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053)

2012-03-23 Thread plroskin
Reviewers: , Message: This is also the first use of a scheme engraver in input/regression. Description: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5882053/ Affected files: A input/regression/stem-cross-staff-engraver.ly _