Re: 2.19.47 long compile times

2016-10-03 Thread Trevor Bača
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Trevor Bača wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > >> More information (this is under OSX 10.8.5 Mountain Lion): >> >> >> On 9/14/16 9:16 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Trevor Bača" >

Re: 2.19.47 long compile times

2016-10-03 Thread Trevor Bača
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > More information (this is under OSX 10.8.5 Mountain Lion): > > > On 9/14/16 9:16 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Trevor Bača" > > >7. LilyPond versions 2.19.47 and 48 are "unhealth

Re: 2.19.47 long compile times

2016-09-14 Thread Carl Sorensen
More information (this is under OSX 10.8.5 Mountain Lion): On 9/14/16 9:16 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Trevor Bača" mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+c_sorensen=byu@gnu.org> >7. LilyPond versions 2.19.47 and 48 are "unhealthy": these two most recent >versions of LilyPond appear to rebuild t

Re: 2.19.47 long compile times

2016-09-14 Thread Trevor Bača
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Masamichi Hosoda wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> The new 2.19.47 is taking about 40 seconds to compile a one-note test > >> file. > >> (MacOS X x86.) > >> > >> In my past experience, new LilyPond builds sometimes take 30 or 40 > >> seconds > >> to compile *on the very

Re: 2.19.47 long compile times

2016-09-14 Thread Masamichi Hosoda
>> Hi, >> >> The new 2.19.47 is taking about 40 seconds to compile a one-note test >> file. >> (MacOS X x86.) >> >> In my past experience, new LilyPond builds sometimes take 30 or 40 >> seconds >> to compile *on the very first run after install* (presumably to update >> the >> font cache, or someth

Re: 2.19.47 long compile times

2016-09-14 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Trevor Bača" To: "lilypond-devel" Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 3:34 PM Subject: 2.19.47 long compile times Hi, The new 2.19.47 is taking about 40 seconds to compile a one-note test file. (MacOS X x86.) In my past experience,

Re: 2.19.47 long compile times

2016-09-05 Thread Trevor Bača
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:40 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Trevor Bača writes: > > > Hi, > > > > The new 2.19.47 is taking about 40 seconds to compile a one-note test > file. > > (MacOS X x86.) > > > > In my past experience, new LilyPond builds sometimes take 30 or 40 > seconds > > to compile *on

Re: 2.19.47 long compile times

2016-08-31 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Trevor, I can confirm the same behaviour on Mac OS X 10.11.6. Running struss semi-equivalent dtruss seems like a nightmare on the mac - all sorts of system restrictions prevent it. Not being a Mac developer I am clueless as to how one runs a simple trace on the mac. Anybody who knows Mac deve

Re: 2.19.47 long compile times

2016-08-31 Thread David Kastrup
Trevor Bača writes: > Hi, > > The new 2.19.47 is taking about 40 seconds to compile a one-note test file. > (MacOS X x86.) > > In my past experience, new LilyPond builds sometimes take 30 or 40 seconds > to compile *on the very first run after install* (presumably to update the > font cache, or s

Re: 2.19.47 long compile times

2016-08-31 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Trevor Bača" To: "lilypond-devel" Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 3:34 PM Subject: 2.19.47 long compile times Hi, The new 2.19.47 is taking about 40 seconds to compile a one-note test file. (MacOS X x86.) In my past experience,

2.19.47 long compile times

2016-08-31 Thread Trevor Bača
Hi, The new 2.19.47 is taking about 40 seconds to compile a one-note test file. (MacOS X x86.) In my past experience, new LilyPond builds sometimes take 30 or 40 seconds to compile *on the very first run after install* (presumably to update the font cache, or something similar). But 2.19.47 is ta