On Mar 24, 2011, at 10:17 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> I've checked the regtests with both my pixel comparator and the standard
>> checker. Generally no problems - changes to beam feathering, stem lengths
>> and lyric alignment with melisma
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I've checked the regtests with both my pixel comparator and the standard
> checker. Generally no problems - changes to beam feathering, stem lengths
> and lyric alignment with melisma are all, I believe, expected
> enhancements/bug fixes.
>
>
I've checked the regtests with both my pixel comparator and the standard
checker. Generally no problems - changes to beam feathering, stem lengths
and lyric alignment with melisma are all, I believe, expected
enhancements/bug fixes.
I am concerned about one feature. The footnote regtest logf
