On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:09:14AM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> Could someone please verify that they are indeed in staging
> (111f4707f90a4512f2c945ee5a47510c210b45f9 and
> 006a7e62037188718465427626174af5b6f03a1d)?
I see that this is resolved now, and hopefully in a few days I'll
get in
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>> git branch --set-upstream staging origin/staging
>>
>> will likely make git pull -r work again.
>>
>
> OK - should be good to go now.
I now get
* commit c81b2dc6fc2c086386abed7a026508e3af9af5e1 (origin/staging)
| Author: Mike Solomon
| Date: Thu Nov 24 10
> git branch --set-upstream staging origin/staging
>
> will likely make git pull -r work again.
>
OK - should be good to go now.
Thanks!
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypo
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> All went well with the rename and I did a git pull -r on the branch to
> boot (which didn't pull anything, as staging has had no new additions
> within the past hour-ish).
Judging from your config file posted previously, your staging branch is
not tracking any u
On Nov 24, 2011, at 10:07 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> On Nov 24, 2011, at 9:50 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> So the question stays: what command did you execute on what branch?
>>>
>>
>> I think I may have just fixed the problem - could you please c
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> On Nov 24, 2011, at 9:50 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>
>> So the question stays: what command did you execute on what branch?
>>
>
> I think I may have just fixed the problem - could you please check?
> My branch was called dev/staging, so I executed git push o
On Nov 24, 2011, at 9:50 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> So the question stays: what command did you execute on what branch?
>
I think I may have just fixed the problem - could you please check?
My branch was called dev/staging, so I executed git push origin dev/staging.
Cheers,
MS
_
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> On Nov 24, 2011, at 9:29 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
>> On Nov 24, 2011, at 9:25 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>>>
Hey all,
I think I pushed two commits to staging today but I am not certain
that my
On Nov 24, 2011, at 9:29 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2011, at 9:25 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I think I pushed two commits to staging today but I am not certain
>>> that my changes actually got pushed (I got a differ
On Nov 24, 2011, at 9:25 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I think I pushed two commits to staging today but I am not certain
>> that my changes actually got pushed (I got a different message when
>> pushing than usual - "Everything up-to-date"). Co
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> Hey all,
>
> I think I pushed two commits to staging today but I am not certain
> that my changes actually got pushed (I got a different message when
> pushing than usual - "Everything up-to-date"). Could someone please
> verify that they are indeed in staging
>
Hey all,
I think I pushed two commits to staging today but I am not certain that my
changes actually got pushed (I got a different message when pushing than usual
- "Everything up-to-date"). Could someone please verify that they are indeed
in staging (111f4707f90a4512f2c945ee5a47510c210b45f9 a
12 matches
Mail list logo
