> Can you file a full bugreport?
Done, issue #716.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>> Can you file a full bugreport?
>>
>> Before I do this: How can I provide more useful debugging information?
>
> The sequence of commands to reproduce. If this started recently, when
> this problem was introduced.
I see this too, but i
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> > programming error: Parsed object should be dead:
>> >static scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
>> > continuing, cross fingers
>> > programming error: Parsed object should be dead:
>> >static scm_unused_stru
> > If compiled with --disable-optimisation, calling lilypond always emits
> >
> > programming error: Parsed object should be dead:
> >static scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
> > continuing, cross fingers
> > programming error: Parsed object should be dead:
> >stat
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> If compiled with --disable-optimisation, calling lilypond always emits
>
> programming error: Parsed object should be dead:
>static scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
> continuing, cross fingers
> programming err
If compiled with --disable-optimisation, calling lilypond always emits
programming error: Parsed object should be dead:
static scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: Parsed object should be dead:
static scm_unused_struct*
