Re: espressivo direction

2006-04-20 Thread Arno Waschk
direction at all; IMO \espressivo should be hard-coded to be below the staff. I ran into another problem -- how do I tweak properties of specific articulation marks? \relative c'' { %% doesn't work; what do I want here? \override Script #'espressivo #'direction

Re: \espressivo direction

2006-04-13 Thread Graham Percival
t want a relative direction at all; IMO \espressivo should be hard-coded to be below the staff. I ran into another problem -- how do I tweak properties of specific articulation marks? \relative c'' { %% doesn't work; what do I want here? \override Script #'espressivo #'

Re: \espressivo direction

2006-04-12 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Graham Percival writes: > Since \espressivo is a hack of cresc/decr, it should be below the > staff by default (currently it is not). How would I change > scm/script.scm to fix this? > > ("espressivo" . > ((avoid-slur . around) > (quantize-position . #t) Somewhere in the 2.7 cy

\espressivo direction

2006-04-11 Thread Graham Percival
Since \espressivo is a hack of cresc/decr, it should be below the staff by default (currently it is not). How would I change scm/script.scm to fix this? ("espressivo" . ((avoid-slur . around) (quantize-position . #t) (script-stencil . (feta . ("espr" . "espr"))) (s