Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote Saturday, August 22, 2009 7:30 PM
Jay Anderson schrieb:
[...]
So what do you think? Should the "SmallStaff" just
be left as a snippet?
If it is a snippet ideally I'd want to do something like:
\include "small_staff.lyi"
\score {
\new SmallStaff {.
Marc Hohl wrote Saturday, August 22, 2009 7:30 PM
Jay Anderson schrieb:
[...]
So what do you think? Should the "SmallStaff" just
be left as a snippet?
If it is a snippet ideally I'd want to do something like:
\include "small_staff.lyi"
\score {
\new SmallStaff {...}
}
How would one make
Jay Anderson schrieb:
[...]
So what do you think? Should the "SmallStaff" just
be left as a snippet?
If it is a snippet ideally I'd want to do something like:
\include "small_staff.lyi"
\score {
\new SmallStaff {...}
}
How would one make small_staff.lyi so this worked? This way it would
be
(sorry for the duplicate message, the first one bounced)
My 2 cents...
1) The 1891 Breitkopf & Härtel edition of Brahms' Piano Trio
Op.8 (1889 version) has the smaller staves exactly 2/3
the height of the larger staves. Click "Complete score":
http://imslp.org/wiki/Piano_Trio_No.1,_Op
Kieren MacMillan Sunday, August 09, 2009 4:47 AM
From my point of view the main use for smallStaff (or whatever it
gets called) is for ossia staves.
Except IIRC ossia staves and solo/cue staves are usually of
different sizes, yes?
In scores for a capella vocal music a piano
accompaniment
Hi Nick,
From my point of view the main use for smallStaff (or whatever it
gets called) is for ossia staves.
Except IIRC ossia staves and solo/cue staves are usually of different
sizes, yes?
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lily
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 05:18:12PM -0700, Jay Anderson wrote:
> If it is a snippet ideally I'd want to do something like:
>
> \include "small_staff.lyi"
BTW, the latest discussion was to use .ily
> How would one make small_staff.lyi so this worked? This way it would
> be bundled with the other g
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Dan Eble wrote:
> Doesn't this mix up meaning and appearance? What will you do when people
> come asking for LargeStaff, TinyStaff, LittleGreenStaff (for Martian music),
> and so forth?
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Alexander Kobel wrote:
> Oh, and by the way...
Hi Jay (et al.):
Attached is a patch which adds "SmallStaff" to engraver-init.ly.
Everywhere that \accepts "Staff" was used I just added \accepts
"SmallStaff". Let me know if this looks good.
Just a small point: has anyone confirmed that -3 is a "standard"
magstep?
1. When looking at hand-en
Doesn't this mix up meaning and appearance? What will you do when
people come asking for LargeStaff, TinyStaff, LittleGreenStaff (for
Martian music), and so forth?
I'm not saying it isn't useful, but maybe it should be named according
to the purpose it serves rather than how it looks.
Quo
> Jay, Mark, anyone: are you interested in submitting a full patch, with
> appropriate documentation, NEWS item etc? If so, we can officially
> submit it for inclusion.
Attached is a patch which adds "SmallStaff" to engraver-init.ly.
Everywhere that \accepts "Staff" was used I just added \accepts
I've always wondered about this. Is there a way?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-08/msg00173.html
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
12 matches
Mail list logo
