On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:26 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> The reason I consider this an excessively bad
> idea is that this would turn an "articulation" into something that
> creates independent music events at an independent point of time.
>
> That would mean that the rhythmic event iterator as we
Changing to [talk] tag as the discussion is more at a "floating ideas"
level now.
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 03:44:27PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
>>
>> >>> {
>> >>> \at 4 \<
>> >>> \at 1*2/3 \!
>> >>> c'1\p
>> >>> }
>> >> [12 days l
