Dear Hosoda-san,
Thank you for posting very detailed package to reproduce the issue,
it was far detailed than I expected. Please let me spend some time
to check it, due to I'm absent from my office in next week...
Regards,
mpsuzuki
Masamichi Hosoda wrote:
>> In my impression, if
>>
>> $ gs -dSAF
This discussion concerns two mailing lists,
some mails exist in both archives,
but other mail seems to exist only in one archive.
For convenience of people subscribing to only one mailing list,
both mailing list archive URLs are as follows.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-09/
> In my impression, if
>
> $ gs -dSAFER -dEPSCrop -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH
> -r1200
> -dSubsetFonts=false -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dAutoRotatePages=/None
> -sOutputFile=filename.pdf -c.setpdfwrite -ffilename.eps
>
> does not embed the completed font into PDF, Ghostscript developers
>
iam
From: gs-devel on behalf of Ken Sharp
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 4:38 AM
To: David Kastrup
Cc: gs-de...@ghostscript.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [gs-devel] Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1
At 20:38 18/09/2017 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>I
At 07:48 19/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote:
I understand why the default behavior of ghostscript changed. But could
anyone who advocates to remove the PDFDontUseFontObjectNum be so kind to
give a clear explanation why keeping it would be a bad idea?
We have, literally, hundreds of command
At 17:27 18/09/2017 -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote:
Masamichi Hosoda wrote:
> >>It seems that `-dPDFDontUseFontObjectNum` option does not work.
...
> There is a tool for using this method of removing duplicate fonts.
> https://www.ctan.org/pkg/extractpdfmark
> https://packages.debian.org/stretch/
Am 19.09.2017 um 04:12 schrieb William Bader:
pdfsizeopt is another pdf compression tool that can eliminate duplicate fonts
and can sometimes merge subset fonts.
https://github.com/pts/pdfsizeopt/blob/master/lib/pdfsizeopt/main.py
I checked pdfsizeopt more than once. Unfortunately it never wo
, 2017 8:27 PM
To: truer...@trueroad.jp
Cc: gs-de...@ghostscript.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [gs-devel] Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1
Masamichi Hosoda wrote:
> >>It seems that `-dPDFDontUseFontObjectNum` option does not work.
...
> There is a tool for using
>>> LilyPond has option `--bigpdfs` for unifying duplicate fonts in
>>> this method.
>>
>> And your point is what ? That's not what the pdfwrite device is
>> intended for, and we don't claim you can use it to do that.
>>
>> As I said, if you think its that useful, then you can add the
>> switch bac
Am 18.09.2017 um 20:20 schrieb Ken Sharp:
LilyPond has option `--bigpdfs` for unifying duplicate fonts in this method.
And your point is what ? That's not what the pdfwrite device is intended for,
and we don't claim you can use it to do that.
As I said, if you think its that useful, then you
Am 19.09.2017 um 02:27 schrieb Perry Hutchison:
There is a tool for using this method of removing duplicate fonts.
https://www.ctan.org/pkg/extractpdfmark
https://packages.debian.org/stretch/extractpdfmark
http://packages.ubuntu.com/zesty/extractpdfmark
As I see it, the availability of a separat
At 00:31 19/09/2017 +0900, Masamichi Hosoda wrote:
When you create a PDF document using something like a TeX system
you may include many small PDF files in the main PDF file.
It is common for each of the small PDF files to use the same fonts.
If the small PDF files contain embedded full font se
Masamichi Hosoda wrote:
> >>It seems that `-dPDFDontUseFontObjectNum` option does not work.
...
> There is a tool for using this method of removing duplicate fonts.
> https://www.ctan.org/pkg/extractpdfmark
> https://packages.debian.org/stretch/extractpdfmark
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/zesty/ex
>> > Please give them a try on your system if you're interested in helping
>> > test the release-in-progress. Your feedback is appreciated.
>>
>>It seems that `-dPDFDontUseFontObjectNum` option does not work.
>
> It has been removed, as documented in History9.htm:
>
> 2017-08-02 13:41:59 +0100
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
