[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> What's the syntax of the s/u/d? Should it always be the first character
> in the glyph name? In feta-bolletjes.mf, I see:
>
> fet_beginchar("Whole Crossed notehead", "s0cross", "wholecrossedhead")
>
> (i.e. "s" as first character before duration),
>
> but also:
What's the syntax of the s/u/d? Should it always be the first character
in the glyph name? In feta-bolletjes.mf, I see:
fet_beginchar("Whole Crossed notehead", "s0cross", "wholecrossedhead")
(i.e. "s" as first character before duration),
but also:
fet_beginchar("Half Crossed notehead", "1sc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Erik Sandberg wrote:
>
> > On Friday 26 November 2004 23.11, Juergen Reuter wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Hmmh, it seems something changed between 2.5.1 and 2.5.2 such that
> > > ligatures are (once again) broken, see e.g. manual, sections 5.16
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Friday 26 November 2004 23.11, Juergen Reuter wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Hmmh, it seems something changed between 2.5.1 and 2.5.2 such that
> > ligatures are (once again) broken, see e.g. manual, sections 5.16.10.1 and
> > 5.16.11: some heads of the lig
On Friday 26 November 2004 23.11, Juergen Reuter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Hmmh, it seems something changed between 2.5.1 and 2.5.2 such that
> ligatures are (once again) broken, see e.g. manual, sections 5.16.10.1 and
> 5.16.11: some heads of the ligatures are missing. Maybe someone changed
> something re
Hi!
Hmmh, it seems something changed between 2.5.1 and 2.5.2 such that
ligatures are (once again) broken, see e.g. manual, sections 5.16.10.1 and
5.16.11: some heads of the ligatures are missing. Maybe someone changed
something relevant in the parser?
Greetings,
Jürgen
_
