I agree with this freak called Janek ;) Actually I can hear there some
reverberation of my own ideas ;) That's great that you want to make
Lilypond more user-friendly and make the initial learning curve not that
steep, but it the same time don't forget our you Ultimate Goal. That's
awesome! :)
All
Joram Berger writes:
>> Well, it's also in the market for dinosaur tools, namely text-based
>> batch processing tools.
>
> If dinosaur means that they will die out as time passes, I don't
> agree.
Living fossils, then. The way of the horseshoe crab...
> Considering the recent emphasis on web-
> Well, it's also in the market for dinosaur tools, namely text-based
> batch processing tools.
If dinosaur means that they will die out as time passes, I don't agree.
Considering the recent emphasis on web-techniques, I feel like some
people actually start liking text-based approaches due to th
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: Jan Warchoł
> To: David Kastrup ; Mike Solomon ; Kieren MacMillan ; Han-Wen Nienhuys
> Cc: LilyPond Development Team
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Serious feedb
- Original Message -
From: Jan Warchoł
To: David Kastrup ; Mike Solomon ; Kieren MacMillan ; Han-Wen Nienhuys
Cc: LilyPond Development Team
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Serious feedback and improvement headroom
Look at what happened with Browser Wars
Jan Warchoł writes:
> Or, to look from other perspective: at current development speed, it
> will take LilyPond somewhere between 10 and 100 years to reach the
> stage where it does most of the things The Right Way (TM) (i.e. that
> most of the ordinary scores are engraved 100% publication qualit
Post Scriptum:
after rereading my previous email, i see that it sounds as if i believed
that implementing the Ultimate Goal (i.e. automatic engraving) and
effectively improving "efficiency" were mutually exclusive. I don't think
that's the case - in some cases the most effective (= with the bigges
Hi,
2014-04-10 11:51 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Am 09.04.2014 11:53, schrieb Jan Warchoł:
>>
>>> Concerning compilation speed - this is indeed a serious problem for
>>> LilyPond, and i don't know which part of the code is most responsible
for
>>> this. Unfortunately i exp
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 09.04.2014 11:53, schrieb Jan Warchoł:
>
>> Concerning compilation speed - this is indeed a serious problem for
>> LilyPond, and i don't know which part of the code is most responsible for
>> this. Unfortunately i expect that changing this would require at least one
>> exp
Am 09.04.2014 11:53, schrieb Jan Warchoł:
2014-04-04 12:43 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska :
(the
handling of accidentals in the input for example: In Amadeus you write the
"visible" notes, that is: the meaning of "d f a" depends on the currently
active key signature). But some others look interesting, an
10 matches
Mail list logo
