2009/6/7 Graham Percival :
> Hey, Jan was just complaining about patches doing too much, and I
> promised to crack down. If we start complaining about patches
> that are too granular, we'll send mixed messages. :)
I was reminded of Jan's post as I replied to Mark, but I thought it
would be OK s
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 07:37:14PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/6/7 Mark Polesky :
> > These overrides in the first example should clearly be \overrideProperty
> >
>
> LGTM.
Thanks, applied.
> I don't think it's necessary to have three patches though; can you
> squash the translations into
2009/6/7 Mark Polesky :
> These overrides in the first example should clearly be \overrideProperty
>
> \override NonMusicalPaperColumn
> #'line-break-system-details #'((alignment-offsets . (0 -15)))
>
> \override NonMusicalPaperColumn
> #'line-break-system-details #'((X-offset . 20) (Y-offset . 4
These overrides in the first example should clearly be \overrideProperty
\override NonMusicalPaperColumn
#'line-break-system-details #'((alignment-offsets . (0 -15)))
\override NonMusicalPaperColumn
#'line-break-system-details #'((X-offset . 20) (Y-offset . 40)
