Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf

2009-11-25 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:02:37PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote: > Le mardi 24 novembre 2009 à 21:20 +, Graham Percival a écrit : > > On the 16th, I gave up and fixed this one myself. However, I > > discovered that I couldn't copy files from srcdir into the blddir > > without changing their nam

Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf

2009-11-24 Thread John Mandereau
Le mardi 24 novembre 2009 à 21:20 +, Graham Percival a écrit : > On the 16th, I gave up and fixed this one myself. However, I > discovered that I couldn't copy files from srcdir into the blddir > without changing their name, which kind-of borks > Documentation/pictures/. I'm quite certain we

Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf

2009-11-24 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:42:05PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote: > Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 17:54 +, Graham Percival a écrit : > > 1) if you can't duplicate the problem after checking out > > dev/gperciva, then I'll check a third time to see if there's any > > old version of waf floating aro

Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf

2009-11-24 Thread John Mandereau
Sorry for the delay, it often takes me a while to catch all traffic on Lily lists when I'm back from a trip, even a few-days one. Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 17:54 +, Graham Percival a écrit : > 1) if you can't duplicate the problem after checking out > dev/gperciva, then I'll check a third t

Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf

2009-11-14 Thread Graham Percival
Ok, it seems the the key was to call bld.rescan(node) after adding it. I'm off to a short conference tomorrow. I expected to have internet access, but when I mentioned it to one of the professors today, he just laughed at me. :(so if I'm not around for a few days, that's why. I'm going t

Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf

2009-11-12 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:21:16AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote: > Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 00:21 +0100, John Mandereau a écrit : > > Does the attached patch convince you to go on on Waf? > > Actually, please ignore my patch and checkout a SVN copy of Waf instead > > svn checkout http://waf.goo

Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf

2009-11-12 Thread John Mandereau
Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 00:21 +0100, John Mandereau a écrit : > Does the attached patch convince you to go on on Waf? Actually, please ignore my patch and checkout a SVN copy of Waf instead svn checkout http://waf.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ && mv trunk waf then invoke waf-light from this chec