Interesting...thank you.
I completely missed that. Sorry for the clutter :-(
On 7/29/10 9:36 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> On 29 July 2010 20:34, Mike Solomon wrote:
>> I think that this patch is the easiest way to assure that the break
>> processing will happen when do_break_processing is call
On 29 July 2010 20:34, Mike Solomon wrote:
> I think that this patch is the easiest way to assure that the break
> processing will happen when do_break_processing is called (although I could
> be wrong), whereas creating a grob doesn't get you a spanner's break
> processing.
Have you looked at th
I think that this patch is the easiest way to assure that the break
processing will happen when do_break_processing is called (although I could
be wrong), whereas creating a grob doesn't get you a spanner's break
processing.
On 7/29/10 9:14 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> On 29 July 2010 19:22, Mike
On 29 July 2010 19:22, Mike Solomon wrote:
> Name says it all.
Why do you need this?
Since a Spanner's parent class is Grob, ly:engraver-make-grob should
have no problem creating spanners.
Cheers,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@g
Name says it all.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1869047
Disregard the changes to lily-guile.hh - all of my patches uploaded with
git-cl spit that out because of Mac OS X 10.4 powerpc modifications I had to
make to get lilypond compile-able.
To apply the patch set directly (w/o the lily-guile.hh
