Re: [PATCH] Two variations on the double repeat sign

2008-09-22 Thread Neil Puttock
2008/9/15 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > LGTM - I wonder whether it would be nicer to put the string -> stencil > code in Scheme, though. Oh definitely, but it's probably best to leave it until after 2.12. I've done a few tests, and it's likely to add a few seconds to compile times. Reg

Re: [PATCH] Two variations on the double repeat sign

2008-09-14 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
Hi all, 2008/9/7 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Here's a patch which implements two double repeat signs as > alternatives to the default type, together with a new context property > `doubleRepeatType' which can be used to change the default for volte > using \repeat volta. Has anyone had a