Re: [PATCH] Make Translator/Performer/Engraver abstract base classes

2016-05-02 Thread James
On 02/05/16 17:31, David Kastrup wrote: It does not make sense for them to be instantiable. https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4840/ Thanks James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/l

[PATCH] Make Translator/Performer/Engraver abstract base classes

2016-05-02 Thread David Kastrup
It does not make sense for them to be instantiable. --- lily/engraver.cc| 17 - lily/include/engraver.hh| 3 ++- lily/include/performer.hh | 2 +- lily/include/scheme-engraver.hh | 3 +++ lily/include/translator.hh | 9 - lily/include/

[PATCH] Make Translator/Performer/Engraver abstract base classes

2016-05-02 Thread David Kastrup
Sorry, it's another patch mail as I don't have a clue how to coax my Ubuntu 16.04 upload.py into working again yet. This is likely to end up wrapped in another patch/issue but likely deserves separate review. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-dev