Pavel,
On 7 January 2012 03:23, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 07:04:22 +
> James wrote:
>
>> Thanks, I figured it was something like that, but the gmail web client
>> doesn't seem to let me save this off separately (i've not worked out
>> how so far) so I was reluctant to cut/past
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 07:04:22 +
James wrote:
> Thanks, I figured it was something like that, but the gmail web client
> doesn't seem to let me save this off separately (i've not worked out
> how so far) so I was reluctant to cut/paste.
OK, I'm sending the patch as an attachment, and I'll send
David
On 5 January 2012 06:58, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
>> However if you do not intend to do more LilyPond dev work then I am
>> happy to handle this patch for you, but I'd prefer a git formatted
>> patch if possible or at the very least a 'diff' file that I can then
>> post for r
James writes:
> However if you do not intend to do more LilyPond dev work then I am
> happy to handle this patch for you, but I'd prefer a git formatted
> patch if possible or at the very least a 'diff' file that I can then
> post for review on your behalf.
>
> This email seems to have just put t
Pavel,
On 4 January 2012 22:32, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> There are two issues with the search box in the online documentation.
> One is that search in v2.15 documentation adds +v2.14 to the
> Google search, so it look in the older documentation.
>
> The other is that "+" doesn't have the
Hello!
There are two issues with the search box in the online documentation.
One is that search in v2.15 documentation adds +v2.14 to the
Google search, so it look in the older documentation.
The other is that "+" doesn't have the old meaning since the
introduction of Google Plus. To ensure that
