On 11 May 2010 02:07, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Here's a new patch:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/1136044
>
> Comments?
Can you set lilypond-devel as the CC list in `git cl config'?
Cheers,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
htt
Here's a new patch:
http://codereview.appspot.com/1136044
Comments?
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Carl Sorensen wrote:
> The tutorial can go in Learning, and a short reference
> (without the tutorial) can go in Notation.
I'm rewriting it so the tutorial isn't needed; although I
don't have time at the moment to post anything. I'll get
back to you.
- Mark
___
On 5/10/10 4:44 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> Or, what about adding a new section on handling repeats between the current
>> Learning 2.2 and 2.3? That might be the best way of including your
>> explanations, which I think are good
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> Or, what about adding a new section on handling repeats between the current
> Learning 2.2 and 2.3? That might be the best way of including your
> explanations, which I think are good.
I'd rather not have vital information in Learning but
On 5/9/10 1:20 AM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> Here's a patch that documents a better workaround for
> issue #355* than the one currently in the NR.
>
> * http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=355
>
> I suppose it's a little too LMy for the NR? Any suggestions
> for improving it?
On 5/9/10 1:20 AM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> Here's a patch that documents a better workaround for
> issue #355* than the one currently in the NR.
>
> * http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=355
>
> I suppose it's a little too LMy for the NR? Any suggestions
> for improving it?
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> I suppose it's a little too LMy for the NR? Any suggestions
> for improving it? Or is it good enough to push?
After Neil's comment to the issue, I'm not certain if you still want
to propose this solution. But if you do,
+\override Score.Ba
From 9f72b1bb969e32b754506a4d9c920d9431837904 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Polesky
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 00:18:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Doc: NR: Using \partial with \repeat.
---
Documentation/notation/repeats.itely | 86 -
1 files changed, 73 inserti
