Re: [GLISS] verbifying music functions

2012-09-03 Thread David Kastrup
Keith OHara writes: > David Kastrup gnu.org> writes: > >> Keith OHara oco.net> writes: >> >> > Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes: >> > >> >> Let's have a look at verbifying music functions. >> >> [and special-cases that look just like music functions to the user] > >> >> balloonText

Re: [GLISS] verbifying music functions

2012-09-03 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > - if a music function affects a note, it always begins with \add, > or ends with an \...After; if a music function does not affect a > note (i.e. \clef) then it doesn't change. Hm. There's something to it, but i'm not sure if it should

Re: [GLISS] verbifying music functions

2012-09-03 Thread Keith OHara
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes: > Keith OHara oco.net> writes: > > > Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes: > > > >> Let's have a look at verbifying music functions. > >> [and special-cases that look just like music functions to the user] > >> balloonText => \addBalloonText > > I th

Re: [GLISS] verbifying music functions

2012-09-02 Thread David Kastrup
Keith OHara writes: > Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes: > >> Let's have a look at verbifying music functions. >> [and special-cases that look just like music functions to the user] > > Most pre-fix functions do seem to be verbs expressing what we want LilyPond > to do to the following m

Re: [GLISS] verbifying music functions

2012-09-02 Thread Keith OHara
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes: > Let's have a look at verbifying music functions. > [and special-cases that look just like music functions to the user] Most pre-fix functions do seem to be verbs expressing what we want LilyPond to do to the following music. The exceptions > appogg

[GLISS] verbifying music functions

2012-09-02 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 10:58:31PM +0200, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: > Le 1 sept. 2012 à 18:25, Graham Percival a écrit : > > > Continuing to brainstorm on the problem of it not being obvious to > > which note a particular \command refers to, what if we used: > > If a prefix music function is consiste