-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Montag, 20. April 2009 05:31:20 Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> On 4/17/09 11:02 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Am Freitag, 17. April 2009 schrieb Frédéric Bron:
> >
> > Hmm, no you are right
On 4/17/09 11:02 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Freitag, 17. April 2009 schrieb Frédéric Bron:
>
> Hmm, no you are right. It seems that when using a music-function, the scheme
> expression is:
>
> (make-music 'SequentialMusic
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 17. April 2009 schrieb Frédéric Bron:
> > Attached is a sample file to show how the definition of spanners could
> > work with my patch. I've also implemented two functions to give the text
> > of the spanner directly in the postfix call.
>
> Attached is a sample file to show how the definition of spanners could work
> with my patch. I've also implemented two functions to give the text of the
> spanner directly in the postfix call.
When I look at your dynamic_spanners_postfix.pdf file, it seems to me
that on the second line (with the
> So, I took a look at the issue today and created a patch, which will now allow
> all dynamic spanner starters to be implemented as postfix-operators.
>
> The short (<15 quite trivial lines!) patch is up for review at:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/39047
>
> Basically, my question for now is whe
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:54:22AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > I know that it is not possible to implement this only with scheme and
> > lily code but I am sure it is possible in C++.
>
> Yes, some simple lines of C++ were required.
>
> Attached is a sample file to show how the definitio
On 4/10/09 5:54 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
> On Sonntag, 22. Februar 2009 09:25:57 Frédéric Bron wrote:
>> I am in charge of the question of (de)crescendo syntax issue in 2.12.2.
>
> Okay, sorry if I'm working on the same issue as you now, but I simply got too
> frustrated with hundreds
On Sonntag, 22. Februar 2009 09:25:57 Frédéric Bron wrote:
> I am in charge of the question of (de)crescendo syntax issue in 2.12.2.
Okay, sorry if I'm working on the same issue as you now, but I simply got too
frustrated with hundreds of pages of old scores suddenly changing
cresc/hairpin behav
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:20:29AM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Le 16 mars 2009 16:31, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > I don't think anybody else has replied, so I'll take a stab at it.
>
> I've been working at a draft reply for a few days, but never found
> what I was looking for.
And clear
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:41:36AM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure why we have both \cr and \<. If the two really are equivalent,
>>> one ought to be deprecated before it is ultimately removed.
>>
>> I have a vague notion that \cr *was* deprecated.
>>
Graham Percival wrote:
I'm not sure why we have both \cr and \<. If the two really are equivalent,
one ought to be deprecated before it is ultimately removed.
I have a vague notion that \cr *was* deprecated.
No! If you look in ly/spanners-init.ly, you will see that \cr is used
int
Le 16 mars 2009 16:31, Graham Percival a écrit :
> I don't think anybody else has replied, so I'll take a stab at it.
I've been working at a draft reply for a few days, but never found
what I was looking for.
> What about reserving \< \> \! **only** for hairpins, and \cr
> \endCr \dim \endDim
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:37:50PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> > - \cresc, \dim, \decr, \decresc produce a text without spanner, applies
>> > only once to the previous note, no need to finish with \! or \endcresc,
>> > this could be implemented with a \markup comma
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:37:50PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > - \cresc, \dim, \decr, \decresc produce a text without spanner, applies
> > only once to the previous note, no need to finish with \! or \endcresc,
> > this could be implemented with a \markup command
>
> I don't like the idea o
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 08:47:28PM +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> I am in charge of the question of (de)crescendo syntax issue in
> 2.12.2. I have posted this on -user list but received little replies
> (only support) so it's time now to post on -devel.
I don't think anybody else has replied, so I'
Hello,
I am in charge of the question of (de)crescendo syntax issue in
2.12.2. I have posted this on -user list but received little replies
(only support) so it's time now to post on -devel.
Here is what lilypond 2.12.2 currently does (in ly/spanners-init.ly):
- \< and \cr are equivalent: they s
Frederic,
I have made some comments in your message below. Thanks for taking on this
project.
This type of proposal probably should go to lilypond-devel, rather than
-user, so I'm cross-posting to -devel.
On 2/22/09 1:25 AM, "Frédéric Bron" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am in charge of the question
17 matches
Mail list logo
