Werner LEMBERG writes:
Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead”
programming errors in the regression test logs?
>>>
>>> They occur sometimes. If they are a regular, they might point to a
>>> problem.
>>
>> OK, thanks. The reason I noticed them is that they were not
>>> Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead”
>>> programming errors in the regression test logs?
>>
>> They occur sometimes. If they are a regular, they might point to a
>> problem.
>
> OK, thanks. The reason I noticed them is that they were not regular.
>
> For the record, I
On Oct 26, 2014, at 08:35 , David Kastrup wrote:
> Dan Eble writes:
>
>> Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead”
>> programming errors in the regression test logs?
>
> They occur sometimes. If they are a regular, they might point to a
> problem.
OK, thanks. The reason I
Dan Eble writes:
> Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead”
> programming errors in the regression test logs?
They occur sometimes. If they are a regular, they might point to a
problem.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-devel mailin
On 26/10/14 02:49, Dan Eble wrote:
> Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead” programming
> errors in the regression test logs?
> —
> Dan
As another example:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4156
See comment #5 onwards.
I think you're hitting the kind of
Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead” programming errors
in the regression test logs?
—
Dan
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
