Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools

2011-12-07 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 01:55:15AM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > KDE uses reviewboard... Until a few years ago, patch reviews were only > done for patches by newcomers, and that went over the mailing lists. > But now more and more features are reviewed on reviewboard. Well, it doesn't s

Re: Trashy Novels

2011-12-07 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 01:29:30AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > writes: > > [...] "Jane Eyre" is firmly planted as one of the two most famous > > English novels :-) > > Huh? Obviously "Wuthering Heights" would be one of those you'd > consider more famous (runs in the family), but I don't

Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools

2011-11-30 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:23:10AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > I don't know anything about open source projects outside of LilyPond, > but could someone branched into other GNU projects perhaps collect > this sort of info? Having participated in or followed a number of free softwar

Trashy Novels (was: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools)

2011-11-30 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:18:40PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > Think of the question in marriage ceremonies: "if anybody knows of a > reason why these two should not be wed, speak now or forever hold your > peace.". > > Despite what one reads[1] in trashy romance novels, that question is

Re: Moving away from make

2011-10-08 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 01:35:02PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > I found some info on creating loops in gnu make, but it didn't seem > possible to have loops in pure bsd make. Well, why would it need to work with BSD Make? Gmake is available as an optional tool pretty much everywhere -- an

Re: Moving away from make

2011-10-01 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 07:01:04PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: > Instead I've made two scripts depend_ly and depen_tex [1] which finds > out what depends on what (think gcc -M), and make [2] takes care of > the rest. I think that's precisely the right thing to do :-) > Would it be good to mak

Re: Moving away from make

2011-10-01 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 03:12:14AM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > I will admit there is one aspect in which I *am* spoiled, though: I am > totally spoiled by python's readable code. I am so accustomed to > writing stuff like > cmd = compiler + ' -o ' + exe_name + src_files > or >

Re: Moving away from make

2011-09-24 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 02:53:56PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > I understand it's been discussed before, but I am wondering whether > it's worth thinking the unthinkable and considering moving away from > make. I know it's been used in loads of projects and is much loved, > but actually, from

Re: developer IRC or skype chat

2011-08-30 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 06:24:37PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > > 2011/6/7 Graham Percival : > > > Anybody interested in setting up a weekly chat?  Either IRC or > > > skype or some other chat protocol. [...] > Hmm, no overwhelming interest. > > Short-term: let's just make a conscious eff