Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046)

2012-04-25 Thread milimetr88
7:07, Milimetr88 wrote: On 2012/04/25 09:57:48, dak wrote: > This was a _one_-iteration loop. After the change, it is a _two_-iterations > loop. In http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/46279 Keith asked me to change that in a separate commit, so I did so. Did he wanted

Re: Brings beamed rest closer to cross staff beam. (issue 5908043)

2012-04-25 Thread milimetr88
http://codereview.appspot.com/5908043/diff/1/lily/beam.cc File lily/beam.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5908043/diff/1/lily/beam.cc#newcode1326 lily/beam.cc:1326: || beam->get_property_data ("direction") == ly_symbol2scm ("calculation-in-progress")) On 2012/04/25 06:29:14, mike7 wrote

Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046)

2012-04-24 Thread milimetr88
Reviewers: Keith, Graham Percival, http://codereview.appspot.com/6109046/diff/1/flower/include/direction.hh File flower/include/direction.hh (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6109046/diff/1/flower/include/direction.hh#newcode63 flower/include/direction.hh:63: // huh? On 2012/04/24 03:32:28

Re: Corrected comments and a function check_meshing_chords divided in two. (issue 5975054)

2012-04-15 Thread milimetr88
relatively to the staff. On 2012/04/14 19:12:01, Keith wrote: On 2012/04/14 13:56:18, Milimetr88 wrote: > Relative to which element? "relative to the staff" Most English speakers think of this construction as an adjective, describing 'position', so we use the adjective

Re: Corrected comments and a function check_meshing_chords divided in two. (issue 5975054)

2012-04-14 Thread milimetr88
Reviewers: Keith, Graham Percival, hanwenn, Message: These corrections are included in the Patch Set 2. http://codereview.appspot.com/5975054/diff/1/flower/include/direction.hh File flower/include/direction.hh (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5975054/diff/1/flower/include/direction.hh#ne

Re: Corrected style of comments (issue 5862052)

2012-03-31 Thread milimetr88
I'm sorry for that, but the next bunch of corrections are in a separate issue: http://codereview.appspot.com/5975054 It seems that following the procedure from http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/commits-and-patches#uploading-a-patch-for-review does not make git-cl ask for the

Re: some comments and complaints on the code (issue 5651069)

2012-03-21 Thread milimetr88
#newcode211 lily/accidental-placement.cc:211: * @return A vector of Accidental_placement_entrys On 2012/02/13 03:36:27, joeneeman wrote: On 2012/02/11 12:27:31, Milimetr88 wrote: > Do you mean @param and @return or the comment to the function? What comment > would you propose? I'm

Corrected style of comments (issue 5862052)

2012-03-21 Thread milimetr88
Reviewers: , Message: This is a continuation of Issue: http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/ Description: Corrected style of comments Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5862052/ Affected files: M .gitignore M flower/include/direction.hh M lily/accidental-placement.cc

Re: some comments and complaints on the code (issue 5651069)

2012-02-11 Thread milimetr88
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/1/lily/accidental-placement.cc File lily/accidental-placement.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/1/lily/accidental-placement.cc#newcode211 lily/accidental-placement.cc:211: * @return A vector of Accidental_placement_entrys Do you mea