Re: Overview of copyright issues

2009-09-20 Thread Travis Briggs
Similarly, the validity of "This work is released by me, the author, into the public domain" in the US is under debate, because US law allows authors to retain the right to redact licenses to their copyright works. There is an argument that the moment you put something in the PD, you lose the redac

Re: release plans

2009-09-19 Thread Travis Briggs
I'll volunteer for helping regtest. You just look at two output images and compare them, right? Any difference, the test fails? -Travis On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:34:41PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: >> Le vendredi 18 septembre 2009 à 06

Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-19 Thread Travis Briggs
The only thing I can tell is that you need to remove the part about needing python, since (as the doc says) Python is now bundled. Other than that, the rest looks accurate and complete to me. -Travis On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:42:43PM -0

Re: osx testing

2009-09-17 Thread Travis Briggs
Things look good here! Tested multiple files from the GUI and the command line (LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond). -Travis On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:59:57PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:56 P

Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-17 Thread Travis Briggs
Okay I guess I misunderstood. This is just the OS X GUI frontend...so I imagine it uses the lilypond binary in my path? -Travis On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Travis Briggs wrote: > I have a devel version (that I compiled from scratch), but I didn't > "make install"..

Re: GUB-OSX 2.13.4

2009-09-17 Thread Travis Briggs
I have a devel version (that I compiled from scratch), but I didn't "make install"...I'm running it using the recommended launcher script, which I put in /opt/local/bin/lilypond If I backup that script, I shouldn't experience any interactions, right? -Travis On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Jon

Re: Switching to Waf instead of SCons?

2009-09-11 Thread Travis Briggs
I have a lot of experience with Apache Ant, so I'd be willing to help out too. -Travis On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > > On 9/10/09 3:10 PM, "John Mandereau" wrote: > >> Le mardi 08 septembre 2009 à 19:53 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : >>> The most important two fa

Re: Overview of copyright issues + Debian

2009-09-10 Thread Travis Briggs
The source material could be public domain, but the snippet itself is a 'derivative work' and is thus under the copyright of whoever made it. -Travis On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Valentin Villenave wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Joseph Wakeling > wrote: >> What I propose is that

Re: Overview of copyright issues

2009-09-10 Thread Travis Briggs
Anyways, as a contributor (!), I definitely support "or later" because it allows for things like the Wikipedia re-licensing. It would have been quite a mess if Wikipedia wasn't under an "or later" clause. I'll volunteer to add GPLv2 text to the top of all the files. Just let me know when you want

Re: [PATCH] Contemporary music: overview of new specialist notationsection

2009-09-04 Thread Travis Briggs
>> >> I really hope that this patch (or rather, this email containing the >> patch:-) has avoided the DOS line endings. I've tested it on a fresh >> git branch by emailing it to myself with new Thunderbird settings and it >> applies cleanly. > Not sure what OS you're on, but Cygwin installs utili

Re: [PATCH] Add 'Compiling on Mac OS X' section to basic-compile.texi

2009-09-04 Thread Travis Briggs
stuff. It'll probably broaden my understanding of the program, and hopefully prep me to dive in with some development. -Travis > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On 2009-09-03, Travis Briggs wrote: >>> I've added a section to basic-compile.tex

[PATCH] Add 'Compiling on Mac OS X' section to basic-compile.texi

2009-09-03 Thread Travis Briggs
I've added a section to basic-compile.texi with specific instructions for OS X 10.5 The patch is attached. Hope this is useful. -Travis 0001-Add-Compiling-on-Mac-OS-X-section-to-basic-compile.t.patch Description: Binary data ___ lilypond-devel mailin

Re: Problems compiling trunk on OS X 10.5

2009-08-30 Thread Travis Briggs
It's alive! It's alive! Which is to say, I have successfully compiled the lilypond trunk (2.13.4) on Mac OS X 10.5.8 (Leopard) x86 Intel. Thanks for the help, I'll write up a step-by-step of what I did tomorrow and post it. -Travis On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Travis Br

Re: Problems compiling trunk on OS X 10.5

2009-08-30 Thread Travis Briggs
;t contain any of the c0590* files. I found them on the ghostscript svn server and copied them using the following commands: $ svn export http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/tags/urw-fonts-1.0.7pre44/ $ sudo mv urw-fonts-1.0.7pre44/* /opt/local/share/ghostscript/fonts/ Still working on getting

Re: Problems compiling trunk on OS X 10.5

2009-08-30 Thread Travis Briggs
place that lilypond could find. I'm re-compiling now after doing --with-ncsb-dir= -Travis On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Travis Briggs wrote: > Hi, > > I'm following the instructions on > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL.html > > I'v

Problems compiling trunk on OS X 10.5

2009-08-30 Thread Travis Briggs
Hi, I'm following the instructions on http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL.html I've installed all required dependencies using macports. I've also done 'export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/local/lib' to get around: "libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3", message: "file not found" Now I'm stu