Re: Male/female/other

2004-09-14 Thread R. D. Davis
Quothe Ralph Little, from writings of Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 10:12:24AM +0100: > Funnily enough, I already commented on this sort of thing and I tend to > agree with Han-Wen on this. So do I. > Further, if we were writing articles on child birth, I think that > phrases like "his cervix" rather ma

Re: Drums broken in 2.0.1?

2003-11-23 Thread R. D. Davis
Quothe R. D. Davis, from writings of Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 12:01:57PM -0500: > What is happening is that the output from the script is somehow being > transposed down an octave. This script was one that I used for My mistake. Looking over some other .ly files that I wrote, I see that

Re: Drums broken in 2.0.1?

2003-11-23 Thread R. D. Davis
onnected with the notes being transposed down an octave. Hence, these are now two separate, seemingly unrelated, issues. -- Copyright (C) 2003 R. D. Davis The difference between humans & other animals: All Rights Reservedan unnatural belief that we're above Nature & [EMAIL PRO

Re: Drums broken in 2.0.1?

2003-11-23 Thread R. D. Davis
Quothe Graham Percival, from writings of Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 09:08:25PM -0800: > On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:16:52 -0500 > "R. D. Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > like some other instrument playing tones, not percussion. Similarly, > > with 2.1.0, the drums

Drums broken in 2.0.1?

2003-11-22 Thread R. D. Davis
this problem? Is there a simple fix? -- Copyright (C) 2003 R. D. Davis The difference between humans & other animals: All Rights Reservedan unnatural belief that we're above Nature & [EMAIL PROTECTED] 410-744-4900 her other creatures, using dogma to just

Occasional partial characters in postscript output

2003-11-21 Thread R. D. Davis
ipt G denoting the trebble cleff (and the notation denoting the bass cleff as well). Unlike the PostScript output, PDF output is complete, but doesn't look as nice as the postscript output since everything looks "thicker." -- Copyright (C) 2003 R. D. Davis The difference between hum

Re: Lilypond 2.0.1 built ok for FreeBSD 4.0 w/gcc 2.95.2

2003-11-20 Thread R. D. Davis
Quothe R. D. Davis, from writings of Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:59:56PM -0500: > Has anyone else run into this problem with ImageMagick? Yes, I know that replying to one's own message isn't considered a good thing. :-) ...however, in case anyone else has any problem installing ImageMa

Re: Lilypond 2.0.1 built ok for FreeBSD 4.0 w/gcc 2.95.2

2003-11-19 Thread R. D. Davis
7;ll have to investigate. > On the other hand i am looking for testers for my lilypond ports > (both 2.0.1 and 2.1.0). If you have time to try one of them, i > would be very happy for any feedback. Ok, if time allows (or definitely if I can't get anything else to work :-), I'll try the

Re: Lilypond 2.0.1 built ok for FreeBSD 4.0 w/gcc 2.95.2

2003-11-18 Thread R. D. Davis
s like a gcc installation problem. > Firstly, the midi module should be compiled with gcc, not g++. > Secondly, libstc++3 is part of gcc-3.0, while you think you're using 2.95. Interesting. This was part of the FreeBSD 4.0 distribution. -- Copyright (C) 2003 R. D. Davis The difference