Hi,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 09:36:24PM +0200, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> > https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/notation/font-families
> >
> > still claims that LilyPond still includes URW fonts, which it doesn't
> > since 2.24.
>
> It does — otherwise, they could not be set as the default
Hi,
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/notation/font-families
still claims that LilyPond still includes URW fonts, which it doesn't
since 2.24.
I'm not sure wether it's ok to just remove the 'distributed with
LilyPond' in the corresponding paragraph or wether this would let people
wond
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 07:43:10AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> I'm going to run `scripts/build/grand-replace' to update all copyright
> years.
I'm not completely sure, but shouldn't the copyright year(s) in a work
only cover the years when the work was originally written or modified?
Ciao,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:26:00PM +0100, Wols Lists wrote:
> > out/parser.cc:2392: warning: conversion to 'short int' from 'int' may
> > alter its value
[...]
> [...] That "out/parser" is a perfect example - it *may*
> be innocuous, or it *may* be a serious problem. It really ought to be
> checked
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:34:57PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> >I'm afraid I'm with Reinhold. As a *programmer*, I consider it very bad
> >practice to ignore warnings. For the system to hide them from me, well !!!
>
>
> They're not being ignored. They're not even being seen. Please address my
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:10:05PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> But we don't solve the problem of the log output. I mean, how many people
> really **want** the full output from the build system?
What about a *default* output similar to what you now get with
QUIET_BUILD=1? That is currently
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:53:08AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> >Little bit difficult as it seems, so here's a simple version (without
> >the combined log). You can invoke it like this:
> >
> >lilylog.sh o.log e.log ls -l . dontexist
> >
> >which is the `verbose' mode (i.e. you still see stdout and
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 08:24:37AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Almost right. However, try not to invent something new. Please just
> use the autoconf/automake behaviour, which follows mostly the convention
> that Linux and Git git have set.
>
>http://www.gnu.org/s/hello/manual/automake
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 02:59:37PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to either collect both stdout and stderr in
> the same log file or to use three log files .err.log, .out.log and
> .log, where the latter contains the combined streams? Otherwise you are
> lo
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:16:21PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> * Wherever possible, stderr output should go to *.err.log and
> stdout output to *.log
Wouldn't it be better to either collect both stdout and stderr in
the same log file or to use three log files .err.log, .out.log and
.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 05:27:03PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> 1. what's the official unix definition of STDERR vs. STDOUT?
Quoting the standard:
3.358 Standard Error
An output stream usually intended to be used for diagnostic messages.
[...]
3.360 Standard
[slightly offtopic tab size rant ;-)]
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:44:21PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> In the old/bad style that emacs produced, one tab was used to
> represent 8 spaces. Yes, it was doubly confusing.
Well, no. People and/or editors who used one tab per indentation
level (and p
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:35:19PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> > >Again, on the shell, it would be something like this:
> > > make ...blah... || echo "build failed" && tail logfile
> > >but there might be a nicer way to do it.
> >
> > but then when blah fails, make will not stop, since the re
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:11:37AM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> There should be absolutely no tab characters for indentation in
> any .py file in lilypond git. All such files should be converted
> to use spaces only.
I'd go a step further and recommend (for python files) that no tabs
are used a
This unbreaks the build in a separate directory on OpenBSD.
---
stepmake/aclocal.m4 |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/stepmake/aclocal.m4 b/stepmake/aclocal.m4
index c062247..8fe2ddd 100644
--- a/stepmake/aclocal.m4
+++ b/stepmake/aclocal.m4
@@ -406,7 +406
[random notes from soneone who is *not* actively hacking on LilyPond,
so feel free to ignore it ;-)]
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> The reason that I'm pessimistic is that we racked up a huge amount
> of "technical debt" (i.e. bugs) during 2.11 and the early pha
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 06:16:08AM -0500, David Santamauro wrote:
> The first thing that jumps out at me is Apache log4cxx. It is a robust
> logging framework based on Java log4j. It introduces dependencies on
> the apache portable runtime library
That together makes 29708 lines of code just for l
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 04:18:17PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> "In your original backtrace, is the X_AXIS parent of the Item in frame #2
> 0x0? If so, I'm fine with the patch."
>
> I've been using this as a learning exercise, and can say that
> Item::spanned_rank_interval calls Item::get_column
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:35:28PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > In your original backtrace, is the X_AXIS parent of the Item in frame #2
> > 0x0? If so, I'm fine with the patch.
>
> You mean the g in line 197 of axis-group-interface.cc?
>
>
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:39:03AM +0700, Joe Neeman wrote:
> > I tried the diff below, which `fixed' the segfault, but it may be
> > completely wrong (I'm currently not familiar with the LilyPond code
> > at all). Unfortunately, I don't have a new enough ImageMagick on my
> > system, so I can't ru
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:55:45AM +, Graham Percival wrote:
> > Bisected to this one (cc'd Neil):
>
> Fantastic! Bisecting is one of the most useful, yet also
> time-consuming, parts of fixing regressions.
Maybe time-consuming, but in theory, everyone able to build lilypond
from git can wri
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 02:10:04PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> I don't know why gdb doesn't find paper-column.hh, but anyaway...
> it looks like Item::get_column() returns NULL, because its parent's
> get_column() returns NULL (I checked that the parent on the X_A
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 06:51:49AM +, Graham Percival wrote:
> The next step in issue 1464 is just to create a backtrace.
See the blurb below this mail (no, I'm not going to sign up at google
for adding it there).
I don't know why gdb doesn't find paper-column.hh, but anyaway...
it looks lik
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:07:29AM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> >> python/ yes, since it's not something that people call manually.
> >> But stuff in scripts/build/ shouldn't have @PYTHON@, otherwise
> >> it'll bork if you call it manually.
> >
> > But are those scripts supposed to be used witho
(unlurking, i didn't spend much time on lilypond recently)
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:59:15AM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> > --) Two scripts still have "/usr/bin/python" lines
> > (python/auxiliar/manuals_definitions.py, and scripts/build/pytt.py).
> > Those should be changed to "@PYTHON@", rig
Hi,
a fellow openbsd developer noticed that the 2.12.3 source tarball
(http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/sources/v2.12/lilypond-2.12.3.tar.gz)
differs from the same version from late december (december, 20th,
I think).
Please avoid such changes in the future, they make the live of
port/pack
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:35:26PM +0200, Henning Plumeyer wrote:
> >I'm not an active musician, and only decades ago I did do music
> >with others (orchestra, choir), so I may be wrong, but I've a strong
> >feeling towards `Taktnummern'. It's less ambigous.
>
> I've been in hundreds of rehearsals
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 06:02:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > yes, but the term Taktzahl is mainly found in technical contexts!
>
> I was talking about "Taktzahlen". Let's see where this leads Google:
>
> Results for: taktzahlen
> #
> Musiksoftware Forum: Taktzahlen bei Sibelius
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 09:59:51AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> >>> find $(outdir)/offline-root -type -l -exec rm -f -- '{}' +
[...]
> >> Well, if that's part of POSIX, then adding it can't be a bad
> >> thing. :)
> >
> > Isn't AFAIK.
>
> The '+' thing appears to be POSIX if I am reading the G
[this is becoming slightly offtopic, but anyway...]
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:19:57PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
> > > > - find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l -delete
> > > > + find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l | xargs rm -f
[...]
> > The `-delete' primary isn't very portable, it
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:16:37AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> > - find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l -delete
> > + find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l | xargs rm -f
> > endif # ifeq ($(out),www)
>
> What's the rationale?
The `-delete' primary isn't very portable, it's a GNU extension.
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:05:51PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> > What's the reason for that `--label=""'? It's breaking the build
[...]
> The commit that added "--label" is
>
> commit d4401de33195113a8859629b4bd9483a03d9ab5c
> Author: Werner Lemberg
> Date: Thu Dec 14 15:28:27 2006 +0100
>
---
GNUmakefile.in |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/GNUmakefile.in b/GNUmakefile.in
index 6574e65..6c2c54f 100644
--- a/GNUmakefile.in
+++ b/GNUmakefile.in
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ WWW-post:
$(buildscript-dir)/mutopia-index -o $(outdir)/examples.html inp
There are two make rules using a command like
find $(outdir)/$* -name '*.html' |
xargs grep -L --label="" 'UNTRANSLATED NODE: IGNORE ME' | ...
What's the reason for that `--label=""'? It's breaking the build
with OpenBSDs native grep (in /usr/bin/grep), and I don't see any
differe
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 06:45:14PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> > It still needs the $(PYTHON), regardless wether it's in scripts/auxiliar
> > or scripts/build.
>
> For build scripts, the $(PYTHON) is put into the shebang when writing
> the script (and makeing it executable) from scripts/build t
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 06:09:15PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> > - $(auxscript-dir)/yyout2grammar.py $(outdir)/parser.output $@
> > + $(PYTHON) $(auxscript-dir)/yyout2grammar.py $(outdir)/parser.output $@
>
> Oops, this script should be in scripts/build, not scripts/auxiliar, but
> this is
The often-used idiom #!/usr/bin/env python not only is potentially
dangerous, but it also fails if there are several versions of python
installed, with the python binaries named python2.4, python2.5,
python2.6, ...
This patch hopefully catches all remaining cases of a missing $(PYTHON).
---
Docum
[sorry for mumbling to myself too much]
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 06:53:57PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
[...]
> -out = file (path + '.ly', 'w')
> +out = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(mode = 'w', suffix = '.lytmp',
> +
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:33:14PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > (I really
> > don't remember the reason, too much time has passed since I made
> > this patch)
>
> It would be nice to know why we need this, esp. as this fix
> does not make the logic more readible.
Not necessary, I aready ha
diff --git a/stepmake/stepmake/texinfo-rules.make
b/stepmake/stepmake/texinfo-rules.make
index 84f2894..6be8c5f 100644
--- a/stepmake/stepmake/texinfo-rules.make
+++ b/stepmake/stepmake/texinfo-rules.make
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ $(outdir)/version.%: $(top-src-dir)/VERSION
echo $(TOPLEVEL_VERSIO
This one makes lilypond build with good old gcc-3.3.5 (which is the
default compiler on OpenBSD). It's probably debatable wether it'll
slow down lilypond runtime and accelerate global warming, so if you
don't like it, let me know; I could also add some #ifdefs (or just
keep the patch file in the Op
Hi,
I have this as a patch in the lilypond port of OpenBSD for years
(since 2006, IIRC), and it looks like I still need it for the
development branch. Without this, configure isn't able to detect
the versions of at least texi2html, makeinfo and bison. (I really
don't remember the reason, too much
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 05:49:13PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> If the a file with the same name always has the same content,
> regardless from which document it has been generated, would something
> like the following help (no real code, i'm not good at all if it
> comes t
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 03:55:00PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
> diff --git a/scripts/lilypond-book.py b/scripts/lilypond-book.py
> index 392ddd0..b9731f1 100644
> --- a/scripts/lilypond-book.py
> +++ b/scripts/lilypond-book.py
> @@ -1273,7 +1273,11 @@ left-margin-default right-margin-defaul
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 09:36:44PM +, Neil Puttock wrote:
> > I guess I could test this tomorrow.
>
> Doesn't work for me unfortunately:
>
> WARNING: Unable to find node 'Scheme tutorial' in book learning.
> cp /home/neil/lilypond/Documentation/css/*.css out-www/contributor/
> cp /home/neil/l
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:31:34PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> @@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ local-WWW-1: $(OUT_TEXINFO_MANUALS)
> $(PDF_FILES) info
>
> local-WWW-2: txt-to-html $(OUT_HTML_FILES) $(DEEP_HTML_FILES)
> $(source-links) $(OM
> # fix links from other manuals to general
> - fi
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 02:38:12PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> I don't have much experience *using* automake, but from what I've
> read:
>
> - A Makefile.am is easier to maintain than an equivalent handcoded
> makefile.
> - The generated makefiles will be very portable (not reliant on
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:28:11PM +0100, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> >The snippets are taken from the LSR and a condition of submission to the
> >LSR is that you consign your work to the public domain (and that you
> >have the right to do so). I know, because I submitted a couple of
> >snippets
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 06:04:17PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> So, having read the past discussion and looked through source code etc.
> it seems like there are several general observations, some conclusions,
> and some questions.
>
> Observations:
>
>(1) Lilypond isn't violating any copy
Kili
--
>> Programme, die mit "k" anfangen benutze ich nicht ;-)
> Und was machst Du, wenn Du mal einem Prozess ein Signal schicken willst?
Dann nimmt er den Gnome-Ableger "gill" (aus Sachsen?).
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:32:16AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> > Just drop it. If the destination file has to be updated whenever
> > the source file changes, let make(1) handle it.
>
> I dropped it in my local copy, and make succeeded. But I have not pushed
> the change to git, and won't. I d
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:18:58PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> I found this interesting link:
>
> https://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/?35556
>
> It looks like "cp -u" will only work under Linux. John added the "-u"
> flag earlier this month to avoid some error messages (likely different
> from you
Hi,
when running
$ gmake web
on OpenBSD/amd64, lilypond tends to bail out in a very misleading
and confusing way -- it segfaults. This is probably reproducible
on Linux when you limit the data size using ulimit -Sd 524288 (it's
really not necessary that someone actually tries to reproduce it,
bu
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:42:19PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > while working on an update of the openbsd port of lilypond, i see
> > lots of fontforge whinings like this one:
>
> > Internal Error in accidentals.flat.arrowdown: monotonic is both needed and
> > unneeded.
>
> Indeed, these
Hi,
while working on an update of the openbsd port of lilypond, i see
lots of fontforge whinings like this one:
Invoking "fontforge -script feta13.pe feta13.pfb"...
Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams.
Executable based on sources from 02:38 GMT 27-Sep-2008.
Library based on sources from
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:32:12AM +, Mark wrote:
> Can I use GCC 3.4. to compile the code?
For LilyPond-2.10.*, try the patches at
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/print/lilypond/patches/
--
All the distortion came from the amp.
-- Paul Gilbert
___
[Applies to lilypond-2.10.25]
Seems like all you guys build with -DNDEBUG ;-)
That cur_chunk_idx isn't defined at this point of code.
Ciao,
Kili
--- lily/ttf.cc.origSat May 19 16:49:56 2007
+++ lily/ttf.cc Mon May 21 11:33:48 2007
@@ -174,7 +174,6 @@ void t42_write_table (void *out
[list cc: changed to -devel, since it's more appropriate]
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 12:36:24PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> The version checking is particularly fragile; this was a fix to make the
> checking work with another package. We're once again reevaluating
> SCons, but the latest versio
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:48:18PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Found when trying to build on OpenBSD:
Fix another fd leak. To reproduce those leaks on Linux, try
ulimit -n 128 (or even 64) before running make all web.
BTW: this all is about LilyPond 2.10.0.
--- scm/backend-library.scm.o
Found when trying to build on OpenBSD:
--- scm/framework-eps.scm.orig Fri Nov 10 14:44:26 2006
+++ scm/framework-eps.scm Mon Nov 13 21:53:37 2006
@@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ stencil, so LaTeX includegraphics doesn'
(display "@c eof - 'eof' is a Makefile marker; do not remove. "
texi-system-port
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 03:54:19AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> The build fails on this snippet, lily-910891298.ly on my system:
well, I'm right now trying to bring lilypond 2.8.7 to OpenBSD, and
get exactly the same error on the same file (see quote below),
except here it's line 488, not
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:42:29AM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> It was released, mostly with minor layout fixes. I'll do a 2.8.6
Any timeline for this?
Ciao,
Kili
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/
Hi,
I'm just trying to give the OpenBSD port prepared by Matt Jibson
some final polish.
Unfortunately, we can't build the documentation on OpenBSD (due to
an old version of makeinfo in the base system), so I decided to use
the downloadable tarball, which is versioned 2.8.5 -- in contrast
to the s
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 12:29:24PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
> > ps: do we really still have to use backticks instead of $(...)?
> > Anyone running LilyPond on old systems with rotten shells?
>
> configure is about portability, why not keep the backticks?
> The same goes for shells with 32bit int
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:51:01PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
> Given:
> $ ls -l /usr/bin/python*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 May 24 15:51 /usr/bin/python -> python2.3
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 958764 Mar 6 11:32 /usr/bin/python2.3
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1024460 Apr 23 01:34 /usr/
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 02:26:22PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> > The -f option tells readlink to rekursively resolv all links and find
> >the file which the link finally points to. Without the -f readlink just
> >just gives you what this link points to.
>
> Hmm. FreeBSD's readlink doesn't hav
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 04:43:43PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> I'm getting the "too many open files" problem again. Using make
> external_binary web now.
[...]
> This arose a few months ago; there was a patch to texinfo that fixed
> it.
Yes, I actually found and fixed many flaws in texin
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:57:55AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> OSX ulimit -n is set to to 256 by default. A while ago, I increased
> that
> to 512 to allow lilypond to build. I'm not certain if this is still
> necessary,
> and I'd completely forgotten about that line in my ~/.profile
> I tr
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:44:31PM -0500, David Jedlinsky wrote:
> ec-fonts-mftraced takes *forever* to run. Is this normal? Or should
> I have installed potrace, because it's better than autotrace in some
> way?
You could do it the way Matt did it: fetch the .deb package, extract
this and put e
Again selfquoting...
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 05:18:16PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:18:16 +0100
> From: Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: More makefile oddities (
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 08:00:18PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> b) references a target `outimages' which isn't defined anywhere, thus
> breaking make web.
I just saw that you've removed this for 2.5, so did I on my local
working copy of 2.4.
However, I now have t
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 08:27:08PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Sorry for any confusion I may have caused.
>
> That's ok, this should be fixed; I'll apply your patches.
Here's yet another one I missed (I had to install a recent makeinfo
before building documentation):
--- stepmake/stepma
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:23:11AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hmm, that's strange. I can't seem to find where
> local_lilypond_datadir would get the DESTDIR prefix, unless it would
> be from $prefix.
Well, I just see that I didn't mention that I'm working on
LilyPond-2.4.x. There you have
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:23:11AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hmm, that's strange. I can't seem to find where
> local_lilypond_datadir would get the DESTDIR prefix, unless it would
> be from $prefix. You wouldn't be specifying them both, like
>
> make install prefix=../fake-i386/usr/p
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:40:21PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > - -$(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips
> > - (cd $(DESTDIR)$(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips && ln -sf ../fonts/map .)
> > + -$(INSTALL) -d $(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips
> > + (cd $(local_lilypond_dat
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 10:54:58PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> could anyone check wether the attached diffs are sane? I need them
> for Matt's OpenBSD ports.
Sorry, I'm probably a little bit too drunk ;-) here are the patches.
$OpenBSD$
--- mf/GNUmakefile.orig Sat Feb 12 13:0
Hi,
could anyone check wether the attached diffs are sane? I need them
for Matt's OpenBSD ports.
Ciao,
Kili
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi,
is there any good reason that lilypond releases aren't tagged in
the CVS since 2_4_2?
$ cvs -qz7 status -v VERSION | sed 15q
===
File: VERSION Status: Up-to-date
Working revision:1.621
Repository revision: 1.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:54:54AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > FreeBSD maintainer of Lilypond is irresponsive :-(
>
> That's too bad.
FYI: Matt Jibson currently works on an OpenBSD port (of LilyPond
and related tools), that I hope to test and watch over soon.
May be that this can be back
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 01:58:08PM -0300, Pedro Kroger wrote:
> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/gnu-guile-projects.html
>
> "snd" uses guile heavily, for sure as extensively as lilypond. I don't
> know about the others.
The big difference between LilyPond and Snd is: LilyPond itself is
partiall
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 08:09:22PM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Just curious: Is there any other project which uses Guile as
> > extensively as LilyPond? I would like to have a comparison.
>
> Not sure. You might want to look at Gnucash and texmacs. Also, I
> believe GUILE is the primary
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:33:34PM +0100, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> You're unfair, you have deleted my smiley when quoting me. It was the
> short way for expressing your last paragraph (sort of).
Sorry, I probably was in a bad mood (for reasons not related to LilyPond).
Ciao,
Kili
___
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 06:12:03PM +, David Bobroff wrote:
> > please double check,- fixed this error a long time ago. If unsure, rm
> > accidental-engraver.cc and update from CVS.
>
> Tried again with a fresh checkout. Same story:
> -o out/accidental-engraver.o accidental-engraver.cc
> acc
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 08:37:24PM +0100, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> I'm not sure that there will be pletor of volonteers for recoding
> thousands of C++ LOC in whatever other language.
You just have to write a C++2scm translator ;-)
> hmmm, thinking of it... I volonteer for LilyPond in Common Lisp!
Hi,
I just built 2.1.33, and since the script-abbreviations.ly is still
completely broken, I kind of "repaired" it (see attachment).
Unfortunately, it's still incorrect (wrong characters for `|' and `>'
due to math mode), but at least now it displays something reasonable.
Ciao,
Kili
% t
[Changed to development list, since it's really a bleeding-edge issue]
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 04:43:34PM +, David Bobroff wrote:
> I'm still getting those same anomalies with v2.1.32; that is, dismbodied
> beams, multimeasure rest numbers displaced to the right, etc. [...]
Me, too :-(
For e
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:29:47AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > is it only me who can't access the CVS server at savannah.gnu.org for
> > the last three days?
[...]
> For me, it's been up again since this morning.
Thanks. I can access it again, too.
Ciao,
Kili
--
Könn't man kyrill
Hi,
is it only me who can't access the CVS server at savannah.gnu.org for
the last three days?
Even ping or traceroute don't get a response. However, some recent mails
on the LilyPond lists made me think that some people get connections
to the server. That's really odd, and it's not a problem of
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 03:03:30PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
[Letters and digits in identifiers]
> If there's no other reason for disallowing digits than to keep
> parser/scanner, I could try to write a patch.
Quick hack alert! The patch below appears to work. However, it appl
Hi,
are there any reasons to restrict identifiers in LilyPond to contain only
letters? IMO, it would be nice to at least also allow digits. That would
make it easier to write large pieces by defining small chuncs of music:
Part1Voice1 = \notes {...}
Part1Voice2 = \notes {...}
...
At least for a
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 12:44:13AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> introducing "exotic" dependencies like makeinfo CVS, there should be
> also workarounds that make LilyPond (and it's documenation) compile with
> standard versions (i.e. good-old makeinfo-4.5 or 4.6).
Pl
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:36:46PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Even then -- I tried to compile the texinfo CVS, which relies on a
> > brand new automake version which
>
> Point taken; you don't need texinfo CVS.
Using the current LilyPond CVS (seems to be an upcoming 2.1.29) and
mak
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 08:43:55PM +0100, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
[interactive Scheme]
> > try #(top-repl)
>
> that's cute :-)
Indeed. Allthough it's a guile-feature, it should be mentioned somewhere
in the documentation.
I'll record all glitches/pitfalls/tricks while learning LilyPond
internals.
Hi,
since I'd like to become a "brilliant LilyPond hacker", and I currently
want to do some more ore less evil scheme hacking, I wonder wether
there's an easy way to debug scheme code or to get something like an
interactive scheme interpreter with LilyPond's extensions allready loaded.
Starting wi
Hi,
the configuration instructions for the Vim mode contain a small error
(at least when using vim-6.2). See attached patch.
Regards,
Kili
diff -rNup ../lilypond-2.1.28/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL.texi
./Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL.texi
--- ../lilypond-2.1.28/Documentation/topdocs/IN
95 matches
Mail list logo
